Topics in Young & Friedman's University Physics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the suitability of using "University Physics" by Young & Freedman as a foundation for transitioning to more advanced physics textbooks. The individual seeks to determine if the background provided by this introductory textbook is sufficient to delve into specialized topics like classical mechanics, electromagnetism, and quantum mechanics, while ensuring they meet the necessary physics prerequisites. They express a preference for focusing on one topic at a time to reinforce learning and retention. Responses suggest that it is indeed possible to move on to advanced texts such as Taylor’s "Classical Mechanics" and Griffiths' "Electrodynamics" and "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" after completing relevant chapters in Young & Freedman. Additionally, recommendations include exploring the classical wave equation and special relativity following the respective sections on mechanics and electromagnetism.
bigmike94
Messages
99
Reaction score
61
I am working through the wonderful book called University physics by Young & Freedman, it’s seems like a thorough introductory textbook. My question is, instead of waiting till the end of the book to branch out into more advanced textbook that focus on mostly one topic for example classical mechanics, electromagnetism, quantum mechanics etc.

Would the book give me a good enough background to explore each topic in depth once I finish that chapter, given that I match the maths prerequisites. For example. Once I finish introductory mechanics and Newton’s laws Instead of moving on to the next chapter id like to start Taylor’s classical mechanics, another example would be once I finish the chapters on electromagnetism, could I pick up and get through Griffith’s electrodynamics. Same with the chapters on quantum mechanics in the university physics textbook. Would this be enough to give me the physics prerequisites for Griffiths intro to quantum mechanics.

I ask this because I would rather stick to one topic at a time and really hit it hard before moving on. I don’t want to forget a lot of the stuff I’ve learned that would have been a required prerequisite for the more advanced textbooks.

Please remember I am talking about physics prerequisites here not maths, I have always kept my maths way ahead of physics to make certain it can’t get in the way.

I would appreciate any response especially for those who have read the textbooks.

thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you could do it. I would do them in the following order: mechanics, e&m, quantum. I would suggest looking at the classical wave equation after Young:mechanics and special relativity after Young:e&m.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, PhDeezNutz and bigmike94
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Back
Top