How Does Topspin Affect Tennis Ball Trajectory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ViolentCorpse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tennis
AI Thread Summary
Topspin on a tennis ball creates a unique trajectory due to the Magnus effect, where the ball's spin affects airflow around it. As the ball spins, the side moving into the airflow experiences greater drag, leading to a lower relative velocity and higher pressure, while the opposite side has lower pressure and faster airflow. This pressure difference generates lift, causing the ball to dip more quickly than a back-spun ball, which tends to stay airborne longer. The discussion highlights the complexities of fluid dynamics in sports physics, particularly regarding how spin influences ball behavior. Understanding these principles is essential for players aiming to enhance their game.
ViolentCorpse
Messages
190
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone,

Using what little knowledge I have of physics, I guess that when a tennis ball is given a topspin, the velocity of the ball relative to the air is higher on the top than on the bottom of the ball. If Bernoulli's principle is applicable here, then the pressure should be higher on the bottom, giving the ball lift.

Now my guess is obviously very wrong, since the contrary always happens in fact (a top-spun ball dips and back-spun ball stays in the air longer), but I can't figure out the correct explanation for this effect. :confused:

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The faster relative speed should correspond to lower pressure, but the boundary layer is so thin (small) that it shouldn't have much effect. The theory behind Magnus effect is that the air flow near the ball tends to separate (detach) further behind the ball on the side spinning in the direction of relative air flow than it does on the side spinning into the relative air flow, resulting in diversion of the wake that trails the spinning ball, with lift being generated in the opposite direction of the wake diversion. Wiki article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_effect
 
Magnus effect is way out of my depth, hehe.

Thanks for your answer, rcgldr! :smile:

By the way, I was wondering; wouldn't drag also be greater on the side moving into the airflow? So is it possible that the side of the ball moving into the airflow might actually have lower relative velocity owing to the higher drag?
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top