Torque and Rotational Kinematics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a grindstone coming to rest due to applied force and friction. The key equations include torque (τ), moment of inertia (I), and angular acceleration (α). The user attempts to derive the coefficient of kinetic friction (μk) but confuses the forces acting on the grindstone, particularly the torque produced by friction versus the applied force. Clarification is provided that the torque causing deceleration is due to friction, not the normal force applied. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying forces and their contributions to the system's motion.
zbobet2012
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A grindstone in the shape of a solid disk with diameter 0.490 m and a mass of m = 50.0 kg is rotating at omega = 890 rev/min. You press an ax against the rim with a normal force of F = 170 N, and the grindstone comes to rest in 7.20 s.

Homework Equations



τ=Iα
ωz0zkαt
τ=r×F

The Attempt at a Solution


\tau =I\alpha

{\omega }_z={\omega }_{0z}+{\mu }_k\alpha t

I=\frac{1}{2}MR^2

\tau =\frac{1}{2}MR^2\alpha

{\omega }_z=0\alpha =\ \frac{{\omega }_{0z}}{{\mu }_kt}

\tau =-\frac{1}{2}Mr^2\frac{{\omega }_{0z}}{{\mu }_kt}

\tau =r\times F

r\times F=\frac{1}{2}Mr^2\frac{{\omega }_{0z}}{{\mu }_kt}

{\mu }_k=\frac{Mr{\omega }_{0z}}{2tF}

F=f{\mu }_k

{\mu }_k=\frac{Mr{\omega }_{0z}}{2tf{\mu }_k}

{\mu }^2_k=\frac{Mr{\omega }_{0z}}{2tf}

{\mu }_k=\sqrt{\frac{Mr{\omega }_{0z}}{2tf}}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, although not provided in the question, I am assuming that you are supposed to find coefficient of kintic friction. (Your attempt at the solution tells me that.)
You erred in this statement:
zbobet2012 said:
\tau =r\times F

r\times F=\frac{1}{2}Mr^2\frac{{\omega }_{0z}}{{\mu }_kt}

Note that, torque produced by F is not the one which is producing deceleration in the disc (It is in a perpendicular direction to ωz!), rather it is f, torque due to friction which is producing deceleration. Keep this in mind and I hope you would be able to solve it, as you know other things, it seems.
 
F=f{\mu }_k <---isn't that the force due to friction? Or am I confused? Realizing I kind of messed up my notation, f = 170N and F_{friction}=F
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top