Torque and segmented lever arms

  • Thread starter Thread starter vi1e
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lever Torque
AI Thread Summary
To calculate torque with segmented lever arms, the effective lever arm is determined by the distance from the axis to the point where the weight is applied. If the weight is closer to the axis, the lever arm shortens, creating a "virtual" lever arm that must be calculated geometrically. The torque is then calculated as the weight multiplied by the horizontal distance from the axis to the point directly under the weight. In this scenario, the torque is approximately 9.5 lb-ft. Understanding the geometry of the setup is crucial for accurate torque calculations.
vi1e
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
My question is: How do you calculate torque when the lever arm is segmented? I have drawn a simple diagram to try to explain what I mean. Does the fact that the weight is now closer to the axis shorten my lever arm, or is the lever arm = D due to the fact that 10lbs is still being applied to the end of the first segment. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • torque.jpg
    torque.jpg
    8.2 KB · Views: 698
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming your segmented arms are rigidly attached - they don't rotate at the corner to the right - what you have is a new, shorter "virtual" lever arm, extending from the axis to the point where the weight is hung. You'd need to do the geometry to figure out its actual length, and what the vertical and horizontal components are. In this case, if the weight is hanging so it freely swings at the top, the resulting torque is the weight (force) times the horizontal distance from the axis to the point directly under the weight.

Scaling the drawing, I make it about 9.5 lb-ft.

Dave
 

Attachments

  • torque2.jpg
    torque2.jpg
    29.6 KB · Views: 639
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top