Torque-Free Precession in Classical & Quantum Mechanics

  • Thread starter Thread starter espen180
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Precession
espen180
Messages
831
Reaction score
2
In classical mechanics, an asymmetric rotating object will generally precess. Expressed in the body-fixed normal system of the object, we have I_i \dot{\omega_i}=(\vec{L}\times \vec{\omega})_i where L_i=I_i\omega_i.

Choosing a simple example where I_1=I_2, we obtain \dot{\omega_3}=0 and, for \Omega=\frac{I_1-I_3}{I_1}\omega_3,
\dot{\omega_1}=\Omega \omega_2
\dot{\omega_2}=-\Omega \omega_1
describing the precession. Thus, \vec{\omega}(t)=(A\cos(\Omega t) , A\sin(\Omega t), \omega_3).

My question is; can this motion be described quantum mechanically?

My first guess was to write the Hamiltionian as \hat{H}=\frac12 \hat{\vec{\omega}}I\hat{\vec{\omega}} with I being the inertia tensor. The difficulty is then to describe \hat{\vec{\omega}} in terms of \hat{x},\hat{p_x} etc.

Am I going about this the wrong way?
Is there any treatment of this problem available? I tried searching, but all the treatments of precession I found were related to magnetic moment precession.

Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
That would still be concidered precession by an external torque, which is not what I am interested in here. Diatomic molecules don't experience free precession. I am sorry if I worded the problem poorly.

What I am interested in is the kind of precession the rotational axis of the Earth experiences, but at the quantum level. For example, a free spinning molecule of white phosphorus (tetrahedral molecule) would experience precession.
 
I see what you mean.

Try the following Hamiltonian:

\hat{H} = \frac{1}{2} \sum\limits_{ij} \hat{L}_i I^{-1}_{ij} \hat{L}_j

where I^{-1}_{ij} is the invserse of the inertia tensor. In the normal system I^{-1}_{ij} = \delta_{ij} \frac{1}{I_i}

The angular momentum operator L is well defined, and the moment of inertia can be taken as constant.

If I am not mistaken, then L does not commute with the Hamiltonian, so that you get precession.
 
Great! I'll try it.
Thank you very much! :smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top