Torque on a suspended uniform bar

  • Thread starter Thread starter nautola
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque Uniform
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the horizontal force exerted on a suspended uniform bar supported by a wall and a cord. The tension in the cord is already determined, and the focus is on resolving the forces acting on the bar using free body diagrams. Participants express confusion about the direction of forces, particularly whether they should be perpendicular to the wall or straight. It is emphasized that for equilibrium, the sum of forces must equal zero, and any horizontal force from the wall must be balanced by another force. The conversation concludes with the assertion that the resultant force must act vertically, indicating a need for clarity in the free body diagram setup.
nautola
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A bar of length L supports a mass, m2 at the end. It is fastened by a pivot at one end to a wall which is at an angle θ to the horizontal. The bar is supported by a cord a distance x from the wall. The mass of the uniform bar is m1. I already solved for the tension: T=(1/2m1 + m2) (L/x) g

What is the horizontal component of the force exerted on the bar by the wall? Let right be the positive direction.


Homework Equations


τ= Ʃ(Fdsinθ) τ=0

The Attempt at a Solution


I set the torques equal to each other at the end with the mass, m2 so that I could determine Ncosθ, the vertical component of the normal force exerted by the wall. I also tried using the same torque equations at the midpoint of L and where T is exerted.
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0032.jpg
    IMAG0032.jpg
    25.2 KB · Views: 937
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume you solved for T by looking at a free body diagram of the bar and summing torques about the left end of the bar. You migbt want to look at that same FBD to solve for the horizontal force component of the wall on the bar by using Newton's first law in the horizontal direction.
 
Is the answer x=0? Because it seems to me that the bar is pushing straight up on the wall, so that just makes the wall push straight down and be done.

My main confusion comes from the free body diagram that I'm looking at. I keep setting it up and I'm not sure if the forces should go perpendicular to the wall, or if they should go straight. Assuming they go perpendicular, I'm not entirely sure how to solve for the horizontal component.
 
Free Body Diagrams tell no lies. You seem to be questioning it,which is fine. But the sum of forces for a body in equilibrium must always be 0. If there is a horizontal force of the wall on the bar, there must be another horizontal force on the bar balancing it, but where ?
 
nautola said:
Is the answer x=0? Because it seems to me that the bar is pushing straight up on the wall, so that just makes the wall push straight down and be done.
Yes
My main confusion comes from the free body diagram that I'm looking at. I keep setting it up and I'm not sure if the forces should go perpendicular to the wall, or if they should go straight. Assuming they go perpendicular, I'm not entirely sure how to solve for the horizontal component.
You can break up the vert force of the wall on the bar into components perpendicular (normal) and parallel to the wall if you want. But their resultant must be in a vert direction.:bugeye::zzz:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top