Torque Pulley Problem: Calculating Angular Acceleration | Homework Solution"

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating angular acceleration for a torque pulley problem. The participant initially used gravitational forces to compute individual torques but received an incorrect result for angular acceleration. They considered using tension forces instead but faced complications due to multiple unknowns in the equation. The moment of inertia for the pulley was acknowledged as necessary for the calculations, and the participant correctly identified how to calculate it using the given mass and radius. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately accounting for all forces and moments in torque problems.
sonic91
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Untitled.jpg

the problem statement is in the pic.



Homework Equations


inertia for cylinder shape= m*r^2*1/2
torque=F*"length
sum of torque= "inertia" * "angular acceleration"
w=mg



The Attempt at a Solution


i was thinking that the weight forces of the masses times the length would give me the individual torques. i converted the cm to m to stay in SI units. having the counterclockwise as my positive direction i set up my equation:
(9.8m/s^2*1kg*.1m) + (9.8m/s^2*4.9kg*.1m)= 1/2*4kg*.1m^2* "angular acceleration".
i got "angular acceleration" = 191.1 rad/s^2. i entered this into the computer and i confirmed that it was wrong.

i was thinking that maybe i needed to use the 2 different tension forces in place of the gravitational forces that i used in my torque equation. but in that case i end up with an equation with 3 unknowns. so I'm not sure what to do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wouldn't you need the moment of inertia for the pulley to?
 
pat666 said:
wouldn't you need the moment of inertia for the pulley to?

in the problem i have enough info to calculate the moment of inertia:

1/2 *m *r^2 using the given mass and radius of the pulley.

1/2 *4kg*.1^2= .02 kg m
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top