Torque Rigid Beam: Find Force Applied by Support 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter mailmas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Torque
AI Thread Summary
A rigid beam of 4.00 m and 50.0 kg is supported at both ends, with a 65.0 kg person standing 3.00 m from one end. The calculation for the force applied by support 2 was initially incorrect, yielding 723.5 N instead of the correct 405 N. The error was clarified after reviewing the torque calculations and the distribution of forces. The larger force is indeed at the support closer to the person due to the weight distribution. The final confirmed force at support 2 is 405 N.
mailmas
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rigid beam with a length of 4.00 m has a mass of 50.0 kg and a uniform mass distribution. It is supported at either end as seen in the figure by resting on the supports, but is not attached to them. If you call the support on the right support 2 and the support on the left support 1, a 65.0 kg person stands 3.00 m from support 1. Solve for the force applied by support 2.

Homework Equations


T=F*r

The Attempt at a Solution


Taking support 1 as pivot point:
Sum of Torques = 0 = Fnorm(4) - (50)(9.81)(2) - (65)(9.81)(3)
Fnorm(4) = (50)(9.81)(2) + (65)(9.81)(3)
Fnorm = (981 + 1912.95)/4
Fnorm = 723.5N but the answer says 405N.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I cannot see the figure that you refer to. Can you post it?
 
kuruman said:
I cannot see the figure that you refer to. Can you post it?
Sure.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-05-09 at 8.09.00 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-05-09 at 8.09.00 PM.png
    2.9 KB · Views: 501
Thanks. Your answer for the diagram you have is correct. If you solve for the force at the other end, you will get 405 N. There must be a mix up somewhere. It makes sense that the larger force is at the end closer to the person.
 
kuruman said:
Thanks. Your answer for the diagram you have is correct. If you solve for the force at the other end, you will get 405 N. There must be a mix up somewhere.
Just calculated it for the other side and got 405. Thanks for the help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top