B Torricelli's Theorem: Speed of Fluid & Height of Opening

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter tomas123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
AI Thread Summary
Torricelli's theorem describes the speed of fluid exiting a reservoir based on the height of the fluid above the opening, represented by the equation V=√2gh. The discussion raises a question about why atmospheric pressure is used at the exit point instead of the internal pressure of the nozzle, as is common in other fluid dynamics problems. It is clarified that for a horizontal pipe discharging to the atmosphere, the pressure at the exit is typically atmospheric, but this may not hold true in all scenarios, especially in cases with varying internal pressures. The conversation also touches on the effects of friction in real pipes, which create a pressure gradient that ultimately reaches atmospheric pressure at the discharge point. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately solving fluid dynamics problems.
tomas123
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Torricelli's theorem relates the speed of a fluid exiting an opening in a reservoir to the height of the opening relative to the top of the reservoir... V=√2gh https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torricelli's_law

As seen in the wiki-link provided, the equation is essentially a Bernoulli's equation problem. My question is why the pressure at the opening where the fluid flows out is set as atmospheric pressure? Whenever you do a typical nozzle problem to find the speed in which a fluid exits a nozzle, you use the pressure on the inside of the nozzle, i.e. not atmospheric pressure. Why is this different?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you give an example of such a problem? I would think it would be typical to use atmospheric pressure as the exit pressure - I don't see how it could be any other pressure.

You aren't referring to a converging-diverging nozzle (like a rocket engine), are you? Totally different.
 
Assuming Patm is correct to use, for a horisontal pipe with an opening to the atmosphere we would have: V12/2 + P1/ρ = V22/2 + Patm

where 1 = somewhere downstream and 2 = directly outside the pipe

If we assume the pipe has a constant area, the continuity equation gives us V1 = V2, leaving us with P1 = Patm which in most cases isn't true.

I'm obviously misunderstanding something.. It's been a long time since I've done problems like these.
 
If you to suspend small but visible particles in the tank so that you could see the motion of the fluid at the level of the orifice what would you observe?
 
For a theoretical pipe with no friction, the pressure does indeed need to be constant along its length. For a real pipe, with friction, there is a gradient ending at atmospheric pressure at the discharge.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top