Total energy of mass spring system?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total energy of a mass-spring system with a mass of 0.7 kg and a displacement equation of y=0.45cos(8.4t). The total energy can be expressed as E = (1/2)kx^2 + (1/2)mv^2, where k is the spring constant and v is the velocity. It is emphasized that the total energy can be determined at specific points in the oscillation, such as maximum speed or maximum displacement, where either kinetic or potential energy is zero. The participants clarify that once k and A are known, the total energy can be calculated without needing to find the position x. The conversation concludes with a confirmation that understanding the relationship between kinetic and potential energy is key to solving the problem.
Questions999
Messages
151
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We have an object whose mass is 0.7 kg moves with an equation y=0.45cos8.4t.
Find the general energy

w=8.4 A=0.45

Homework Equations



E=mv^2/2 +kA^2/2

The Attempt at a Solution



So I found k using w=(k/m)^0.5. And then I found V0 using V0=A*(k/m)^0.5
and then i found x using F=kx
Then I found V=V0*(1-x^2/A^2)^0.5
And then I used E=kA^2/2+mv^2/2

IS THIS RIGHT?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When the object is at 0 displacement and max speed v0, all of its energy is kinetic. Therefore, you can find the total energy of the system by just computing the kinetic energy (1/2)mv0^2 at this instant.

Alternatively, a quarter of a period later, when the object is at max displacement A and 0 speed, all of the kinetic energy that it had has been converted into elastic potential energy in the spring. Therefore, at this instant, you can compute the total energy of the system simply by computing the elastic potential energy (1/2)kA^2

Both of these expressions will give you the same answer for the total energy of the system, so you would use one, or the other, but not both.

The expression for the total system energy at an arbitrary time t is just the sum of the kinetic and potential energy of the mass:

E = (1/2)kx^2 + (1/2)mv^2

Where "x" is the position at time t, and "v" is the speed at time t. However, it is easiest to pick a time t where one of these two energy terms is zero, like I did in the two cases above. The first case was for x=0, v=v0. The second case was for x=A, v=0. Do you understand now?

One more thing. I notice that you used "y" instead of "x" to denote the position of the mass. This suggests to me that the mass is oscillating vertically. If that's true, then you need to consider *gravitational* potential energy as well.
 
Thank you so much.Now I understand it all :)
So I guess that now I only have to use w=(k/m)^0.5 and F=kx to find x :)
 
Last edited:
Elaia06 said:
Thank you so much.Now I understand it all :)
So I guess that now I only have to use w=(k/m)^0.5 and F=kx to find x :)

No, you don't need to find "x" (or "y" in this case). Like I clearly explained above, once you know k and A, you can get the total energy of the system.


OR, once you know m and v0, you can get the total energy of the system.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top