Total Mechanical Energy: Mass or No Mass?

AI Thread Summary
Total mechanical energy can be expressed as energy per unit mass, which simplifies calculations by eliminating the mass variable. The equation is modified to gh + 0.5v², focusing on energy per kilogram rather than total energy. This approach allows for easier analysis of systems, such as water flow, where energy transfer efficiency is a consideration. Understanding this concept helps clarify why mass is not explicitly included in the calculations. The discussion emphasizes the practical application of energy per unit mass in real-world scenarios.
TyErd
Messages
297
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the diagram I have attached the initial question is to find the total mechanical energy. however in the solutions which I have placed under the diagram, they don't use the mass (m). So total mechanical energy i thought was = mgh + 0.5mv^{2} but they use gh + 0.5v^{2} . no mass. why

i think its something to do with the question asking to be in per unit mass but i don't see why.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • dadadadad.png
    dadadadad.png
    23.7 KB · Views: 417
Physics news on Phys.org
They ask you for the energy per unit mass that is present, and so they divide both sides of the equation by the mass. It's nothing more complicated than that. It's a more useful quantity to consider in this situation than the amount of energy present, which depends upon how big a "parcel" of water you consider.
 
Think of it this way: every kilogram of water that passes by carries with it 0.887 kJ of mechanical energy. You have the volume flow rate (which is the volume of water that flows by in 1 second). You can use that to determine the mass flow rate (the rate at which water flows by in kg/s). Combine that with your energy per unit mass, and suddenly you have the energy per second being generated (EDIT: or at least the energy per second that could be generated if all of that mechanical energy in the water flow could be transferred to some other system with 100% efficiency -- in a real hydro plant the efficiency is sure to be lower).
 
in essence,

per unit mass = mass = 1

so mgh = 1gh = gh

same with KE
 
thankyou guys. helps alot
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Back
Top