Total Momentum Operator for Free Scalar Field

nicksauce
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,270
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


I want to show that
\mathbf{P} = -\int d^{3}x}\pi(x)\nabla\phi(x) = \int{\frac{d^{3}p}{(2\pi)^3}\mathbf{p}a_{p}^{\dagger}a_p

for the KG field.

Homework Equations


\phi(x) = \int{\frac{d^{3}p}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\omega_p}}(a_p + a_{-p}^{\dagger})e^{ipx}

\pi(x) = -i\int{\frac{d^{3}p}{(2\pi)^3}\sqrt{\frac{\omega_k}{2}}(a_p - a_{-p}^{\dagger})e^{ipx}

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm having trouble seeing why this is true. What happens to the a_pa_k[/tex] and a_p^{\dagger}a_k^{\dagger}-like cross terms?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd write \pi(x) and \phi(x) as

\pi(\textbf{x}) = -i\int{\frac{d^{3}\textbf{p}'}{(2\pi)^3}\sqrt{\frac{\omega_{p'}} {2}}(a_{\textbf{p}'} - a_{-\textbf{p}'}^{\dagger})e^{i\textbf{p}'\cdot\textbf{x}}

\phi(\textbf{x}) = \int{\frac{d^{3}\textbf{p}}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\omega_{\textbf{p}}}}(a_{\textbf{p}} + a_{-\textbf{p}}^{\dagger})e^{i\textbf{p}\cdot\textbf{x}}

Then just calculate \mathbf{\nabla}\phi, substitute everything in and do the integration over \textbf{x} first. You should get something with a delta function like \delta^3(\textbf{p}+\textbf{p}'), which allows you to get rid of all the a_{\textbf{p}}a^{\dagger}_{-\textbf{p}'}[/itex]-like cross terms just by integrating over \textbf{p}'.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top