How Does a Spring Affect Maximum Compression in a Totally Inelastic Collision?

AI Thread Summary
In a totally inelastic collision involving two blocks, the maximum compression of a spring can be determined using conservation of momentum and energy principles. The initial momentum of the system is calculated, leading to a final velocity of 5 m/s for the combined masses. The kinetic and potential energy equations are set up to find the energy stored in the spring at maximum compression. A calculation error is identified in determining the compression distance, which should be 25 cm instead of the initially calculated 5 cm. The discussion emphasizes the importance of careful algebraic manipulation in solving for the spring's compression.
suspenc3
Messages
400
Reaction score
0
a block of mass m1 = 2kg slides along a frictionless table with a speed of 10m/s. Directly in front of it, and moving in the same direction is a block of mass m2 = 5kg moving at 3.0m/s. A massless spring with a spring constant of k = 1120N/m is attached to the near side of m2. When the blocks collide what is the max compression of the spring?

Ok, this would be treated as a totally inelastic collision because at the point of max compression, the two masses will be moving together as one, right?

my question is how do I incorporate the spring constant into the forumlas?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you need to use both energy and momentum in this situation. Use conservation of momentum to determine the velocity of the m1-m2 system at the point of maximum compression, then calculate the difference in kinetic and potential energies in the initial and final situations to determine how much potential energy is stored in the spring and thus how far it is compressed.
 
yes...That makes sence..heres what I did

p_1_i + p_2_i = p_2_f
m_1v_1_i + m_2v_2_i = (m_1 + m_2)V

Solve for V:

V = 5m/s

and then:

K_i + U_i = K_f + U_f
1/2m_1v_1^2 + 1/2m_2v_2^2 + 0 = 1/2(m_1 + m_2)V^2 + 1/2kx^2

solve for x yields 0.05m or 5cm...but in the book it should be 25cm

What did I do wrong?
 
Looks like it's just a numerical/algebraic error. Your final velocity is correct and your equation relating the energies is correct, double check your calculation when solving for x.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top