Tractor Trailer Weight Distribution: Rear Axle Adjustment Tips

  • Thread starter Thread starter Last Stand
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Trailer
AI Thread Summary
Excess weight on the rear axle of a tractor trailer can lead to tickets, prompting the need for adjustments. To correct this, moving the wheels further back is generally recommended, but simply relocating them may not address varying load distributions. Understanding the maximum allowable weight and the specific load distribution is crucial for proper axle placement. It’s important to avoid leaving the adjustment to the driver’s discretion, as this could lead to further issues. Establishing a clear guideline for optimal axle positioning based on load types can help prevent future violations.
Last Stand
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
OK One of my drivers received a ticket for having too much weight on the rear axle of the truck. In order to correct this problem, do we need to move the wheels further back, or closer to the tractor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A schematic picture would help, but I believe you want to move the wheels back. If you know the excess weight on the rear axle (and the max allowed weight ) and have a rough idea of the dimensions and load distribution it is possible to get an estimate of how much further back the wheels need to be.
 
I was under the assumption that if we simply moved the wheels as far back as they could go, that that would solve the problem. The problem is, when the truck is loaded, it picks up product at different locations, with different weights each time. And I DON"T want to leave it at the driver's discretion as to how far forward or backward to keep that rear axle.
 
Moving the wheels as far back as possible is the best you can do. However, that does not mean you've solved the problem for any load/distribution. It is probably a good idea to figure out what you max allowable load should be for that position of the axle.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top