Train chase: collision avoidance

  • Thread starter Thread starter a lone fishy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision Train
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a train collision avoidance scenario where an express train must reduce its speed to avoid hitting a freight train ahead. Participants analyze the conditions under which the express train can safely decelerate without colliding, considering various speed reduction options. The consensus is that reducing speed to match the freight train's velocity of 12 m/s is the least significant change necessary to avoid a collision. However, there is debate about the phrasing of the question, particularly the use of "just" in relation to the options provided. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of determining safe stopping conditions in train operations.
a lone fishy
Messages
20
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



The driver of an express train traveling at 38 m/3 [E] sees a freight train 120 m ahead on the same line traveling at a constant velocity of 12 m/2 [E]. He immediately applies his brakes and just avoids a collision. Assume that the freight train maintains its constant velocity. To just avoid the collision the driver of the express train must:

a. reduce his speed to zero
b. reduce his speed to 12 m/s
c. reduce his speed to below 12 m/s
d. reduce his speed but keep well above 12 m/s
e. not possible

Homework Equations


[/B]
Not even sure if we need kinematics equation for this

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I've ruled our options D and E as potential answers.
im not sure if I have to do any calculations or if this is just some sort of theory question

knowns of train:
v1 = 38m/s [E]
dtrain = d

knowns of freigh train
v1 = 12m/s [E]
v2 = 12m/s [E]
a= 0
dfreight train = 120 + d

I tried equating them but there were too many unknown variables in the way

EDIT:
whoops i meant "chase" question
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This question is not asking how quickly he has to slow down, but only what are the conditions such that Train 1 does not hit Train 2.
Let me ask a similar question...
If Train 1 is right behind Train 2 and NOT going to hit train 2, what can you say about the relative velocities of the trains?
 
their relative velocties would be the same i believe

so the question I have now is that to just avoid collision, if the train reduces its speed to the same as the freight train, they would never collide correct? But then again if the train reduces its speed to zero then they would never collide either. also if the train reduces its speed to below that of the freight train then they would never collide either
 
Right on all counts. So the most correct answer would be the least significant change necessary to just avoid the collision.
 
So that would mean reducing the train's speed to 12 m/s i assume
 
a lone fishy said:
if the train reduces its speed to the same as the freight train, they would never collide correct?
That does not follow.
The question statement bothers me. None of the options is a necessary and sufficient condition to avoid a collision. One of them is the least necessary action of those listed, and you have correctly identified it. But whether a collision is thereby avoided depends on how quickly the train's speed reduces.
And what really bothers me about the question is the word "just". That doesn't sit well with the list of options at all.

Edit: Please double check that you have posted the entire question, word for word.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top