Transcendental function and a finite well

  • Thread starter Thread starter Taylor_1989
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the implications of a question regarding finite potential wells and their energy levels. There is confusion about the conditions for bound states, specifically whether the potential V0 should be greater than or less than the energy E. The relationship between the depth and width of the well and the number of solutions to the transcendental equation is emphasized, noting that increasing V0 increases the radius of the corresponding circle, thus allowing for more energy levels. The inquiry also touches on the comparison between finite and infinite wells, highlighting that infinite wells have an infinite number of energy levels. Understanding these relationships is crucial for interpreting the transcendental equation and its implications for bound states.
Taylor_1989
Messages
400
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


I am not having trouble with this question as such more trying to get to grips with the intuition of what the question is implying, also I believe there is a mistake in the question as the solutions give to not mange the given energy condition, they state that ##V_0>E## where I believe it should be ##V_0<E## for the solution that they have given.

The question is displayed below:
fintewell.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


My issue with part d) is how can I say for a finite well the amount of solutions as when you find the trans-dental equation the number or solution correspond to the points of intersection which correspond to the depth/width of the well. It also dose depend on the ##V_0## as when you parametrise the transcendental the radius of the circle depends on ##V_0## so by increasing the potential you increase the radius thus increase the number of energy levels. But What I don’t understand it the regards to the infinite as there are infinite amount of energy levels due to the infinite potential.

Am I reading this question correctly or have I missied understood the context.
 

Attachments

  • fintewell.png
    fintewell.png
    37.7 KB · Views: 625
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the solutions given are for bound states. This would mean that ##E<V_0##. In part (d) you are not asked to count how many bound states, but to discuss on what this number depends. This is implicit in the transcendental equation which you are asked to interpret and the way it is solved. For example, does a skinny but deep well have more energy levels than a broad and shallow well? What must relation between parameters must be true in order to have more bound states? Once you acquire that insight you can extend to the infinite well.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top