Can an Integral Be Transformed into a Triple Integral?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anna Kaladze
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenge of transforming a specific integral into a triple integral format. The original poster, Anna, seeks to understand if the integral of an exponential area can be manipulated to express it as a double integral with the integral signs positioned to the left of the exponential function. Responses indicate that achieving this transformation is complex due to the non-linear nature of the relationship involved, suggesting that the region for the double integral will be non-trivial and dependent on the function. Anna concludes that she may need to rely on a sequence of NIntegrations rather than a straightforward double integral. The conversation highlights the difficulties in manipulating integrals with exponential terms and non-linear relationships.
Anna Kaladze
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Dear All,
Sorry perhaps for a silly-looking question from someone who does not have very strong math skills.
In the attached pdf file, I describe a problem which I have been trying to unsuccessfully crack after trying a few manipulations.

Some intuitive thoughts are as follows: the inner two integrals over dy and dd give an area. Perhaps that area depends only on the "height" m. Suppose this area is a sheet of density 1/unit area. The final goal is to integrate E^area over dm.

Is the integral of exponential area of unit density/area = integral of unit area of exponential density/area? Can we pull that exponential "through" the integration?

Any other suggestions helping to transform (1) into a triple integral are highly appreciated.

Thanks a lot.

Anna.
P.S. This is not a h/w question, it is for my own research.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Have you made any progress on this. Perhaps someone has ideas about a simpler case.


Does \int_0^t \left[ e^{\int_y^t f(x) dx } \right] dy [/itex]<br /> <br /> capture what your asking about?<br /> <br /> We want to express this as a double integral with the integral signs both to the left of e.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Have you made any progress on this. Perhaps someone has ideas about a simpler case.


Does \int_0^t \left[ e^{\int_y^t f(x) dx } \right] dy [/itex]<br /> <br /> capture what your asking about?<br /> <br /> We want to express this as a double integral with the integral signs both to the left of e.
<br /> <br /> Hi Tashi,<br /> Thanks a lor for your reply.<br /> I think it is not possible to trasform that integral the way I want. I had to do a sequence of NIntegrations as oppsed to doing a simple double integral.<br /> Regards,<br /> Anna.
 
Anna Kaladze said:
Dear All,
Sorry perhaps for a silly-looking question from someone who does not have very strong math skills.
In the attached pdf file, I describe a problem which I have been trying to unsuccessfully crack after trying a few manipulations.

Some intuitive thoughts are as follows: the inner two integrals over dy and dd give an area. Perhaps that area depends only on the "height" m. Suppose this area is a sheet of density 1/unit area. The final goal is to integrate E^area over dm.

Is the integral of exponential area of unit density/area = integral of unit area of exponential density/area? Can we pull that exponential "through" the integration?

Any other suggestions helping to transform (1) into a triple integral are highly appreciated.

Thanks a lot.

Anna.
P.S. This is not a h/w question, it is for my own research.

After looking at your integral, (the one inside your exponential), you are going to get a non-trivial region for the double integral that is of course dependent on your function (that is it's not going to be a rectangle or even any static region, but something more complex).

As for turning your equation into a triple integral, good luck with that. I can't think of any transform off the top of my head that will turn your exponential term into a relevant integral. Most transforms I've seen transform standard integrals that a linear into other linear integrals. The fact that you've got this non-linear relationship makes it a lot more complicated.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top