Transforming from polar to parametric functions

Aikon
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I want to convert a curve from polar coordinates function to a parametric function.
The function is:
r = 2 \cdot \cos( 4\cdot\theta )

I want to convert this for ( x(t), Y(t) ).
Why do I want this? Because I saw that wxMaxima make plots of parametric functions, but I don't know how to plot polar functions.

Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't know anything about wxMaxima but I'm sure you wouldn't be happy with the parametric equations you would get. Why don't you learn how to do it in wxMaxima? Try looking here:
http://math.hawaii.edu/~dave/wxMaxima/polar_plot.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
LCKurtz said:
I don't know anything about wxMaxima but I'm sure you wouldn't be happy with the parametric equations you would get. Why don't you learn how to do it in wxMaxima? Try looking here:
http://math.hawaii.edu/~dave/wxMaxima/polar_plot.pdf

Hi Kurtz,
Thanks, I will read the article later, it appears to be whatI need.
It is because of people like you that I love this forum.

See you,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top