Transistors - Diodes with a perk?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Femme_physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diodes Transistors
AI Thread Summary
Transistors can be viewed as advanced diodes since they function as one-way valves and also amplify current, making them versatile components. However, the manufacturing process for transistors is more complex and costly due to their additional junctions and leads, which results in higher expenses compared to diodes. In integrated circuits, transistors are preferred because they can perform multiple functions, including simulating capacitors and inductors, while also being more space-efficient on the chip. Despite the higher individual cost, the overall integration of transistors can lead to cost-effectiveness in circuit design. Ultimately, the choice between using diodes and transistors often hinges on the specific application and the benefits of multifunctionality within integrated circuits.
Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
Are transistors essentially diodes with a perk? I mean, they do exactly what diodes do (one way valves) AND they can amplify current. Doesn't that make them more efficient? Why not make only transistors then? They appear to be always made out of the same basic materials, so I don't see the big difference in the monetary spending.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
For one, diode only have PN junction and BJT have NPN or PNP junction, one more process to form, it is always more expensive. On top, you put 3 leads in BJT instead of two, all come to $$$! Also, the doping profile for transistor optimized for current gain, not necessary for low parasitic resistance. In fact collector is usually lightly doped meaning higher resistance and base is very thin, look at some of the transistor data sheet, the maximum base current is limited...I better stop here as I am not a semi-conductor expert by any stretch!
 
So, I guess it always comes down to money, doesn't it? :smile: Thanks for clearing it up, and with details!
 
There is a difference between making individual components and components within an integrated circuit.

Within an integrated circuit the cost comparison is

inductor> capacitor>> resistor > diode > transistor.

As a result transistors are often used within integrated circuits to diode and resistor functions which they can do directly and to simulate capacitors and inductors which they can do indirectly.

The actual size on chip also follows the above list so using transistors rather than other components so this is another reason transistors are used in preference.
 
Studiot said:
There is a difference between making individual components and components within an integrated circuit.

Within an integrated circuit the cost comparison is

inductor> capacitor>> resistor > diode > transistor.

As a result transistors are often used within integrated circuits to diode and resistor functions which they can do directly and to simulate capacitors and inductors which they can do indirectly.

The actual size on chip also follows the above list so using transistors rather than other components so this is another reason transistors are used in preference.

Inside ICs, it is a totally different story. We tie the B to C and it become a diode. There are no cost difference making a diode and transistor because as long as you have transistors, you need the number of process to make transistor regardless, so you cannot save a process putting a dedicated diode. So cost is not an issue anymore.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top