Transition Matrices: Solving X[T]X & T(v_1)=v_2

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Artusartos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices Transition
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on understanding the computation of the expression X[T]X and the linear transformation properties T(v_1) = v_2 and T(v_2) = av_1 + bv_2. Participants clarify that these equations are illustrative examples rather than derived from specific principles. The confusion arises from interpreting these transformations as general rules rather than specific cases. Ultimately, the consensus is that the transformations serve as examples to illustrate linear mappings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear transformations in vector spaces
  • Familiarity with matrix notation and operations
  • Knowledge of vector representation and mapping
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra, including eigenvectors and eigenvalues
NEXT STEPS
  • Study linear transformation properties in detail
  • Explore matrix multiplication and its implications in linear algebra
  • Learn about specific examples of linear transformations and their applications
  • Investigate the role of eigenvectors and eigenvalues in transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, educators teaching vector spaces, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of linear transformations and matrix operations.

Artusartos
Messages
236
Reaction score
0
I am a bit confused about the page that I attached...

I don't understand part (ii)...

How can you compute X[T]X? So why is T(v_1)=v_2 and T(v_2)=av_1 + bv_2?

Thanks in advance...
 

Attachments

  • 20130105_222318.jpg
    20130105_222318.jpg
    34.1 KB · Views: 419
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Artusartos.

Are you just trying to find the linear transformation given those properties of how v1 and v2 maps to v1' and v2'?
 
chiro said:
Hey Artusartos.

Are you just trying to find the linear transformation given those properties of how v1 and v2 maps to v1' and v2'?


Hi,


I'm not trying to find anything. I was just trying to undestand the page that I attached (Part ii)...I don't understand why they wrote T(v_1) = v_2 and T(v_2) = av_1 + bv_2
 
I think (but am not certain) that this is just an example transformation.
 
chiro said:
I think (but am not certain) that this is just an example transformation.

Oh...so are they just making that up to give an example? I thought they were deriving those equations from somewhere, and that's why I was confused...
 
I'm pretty sure it is just an example.
 
chiro said:
I'm pretty sure it is just an example.

Ok thanks :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K