How do you translate word phrases into algebraic symbols?

  • Thread starter Thread starter VashtiMaiden
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Translating word phrases into algebraic symbols can be challenging, especially when the English used is unclear. For example, "the odd integer consecutive to and less than the odd integer n" can be represented as "n - 2." The phrases regarding the square of the sum of x and y are poorly constructed, leading to confusion about their meanings, with interpretations suggesting either 5 - (x + y)² = 12 or (5 - (x + y))² = 12. Additionally, the phrase "the squares of the reciprocal of the sum of x and y is 15" is incorrect; it should use the singular "square" instead of "squares." Clear and precise language is essential for accurately translating mathematical descriptions into algebraic expressions.
VashtiMaiden
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hello.
You might find this too noobish but pls help me.

My "analysis" is very poor, since English is not my native language and i can hardly speak in english! :cry:

Can you please help me translate these word phrases into algebraic symbols?

*the odd integer consecutive to and less than the odd integer n

What's the difference between these two "word phrases"
*the square of the sum x and y subtracted from 5 is 12
*the square of the sum x and y, subtracted from 5 is 12
?:confused:

And how about "the squares of the reciprocal of the sum of x and y is 15"?

The word "squares" kinda confused me.
Is it really plural? or singular?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi VashtiMaiden! :smile:
VashtiMaiden said:
the odd integer consecutive to and less than the odd integer n

hmm … "consecutive to" usually means "the next one" … but I suppose it could mean "the previous one". In symbols: "n - 2".

Personally, I think that's bad English. :frown:
What's the difference between these two "word phrases"
*the square of the sum x and y subtracted from 5 is 12
*the square of the sum x and y, subtracted from 5 is 12
?:confused:

Those really are bad English.

I think they both mean 5 - (x + y)² = 12.

I suppose the first one might mean (5 - (x + y))² = 12. :frown:

But whoever wrote them needs English lessons.

Where did you find them?
And how about "the squares of the reciprocal of the sum of x and y is 15"?

The word "squares" kinda confused me.
Is it really plural? or singular?

Again, bad English … "reciprocal" is singular, so it should be "square". "Squares" is wrong. :smile:
 
:cry: Thank you. ...and anyway, "bad english" is not my fault. And those are phrases not sentences.
 
A sentence about mathematical descriptions can, or should be an equation or an inequality. A phrase or may likely ONLY be expressable as an algebraic expression. Actually, the English used in expressing or describing the mathematical relation or description NEEDS to be precise in order to be clear enough to express in mathematical symbolism. In the effort to learn English and coordinate it with Mathematics, drawing pictures and showing diagrams are extremely useful in the learning process and in the learning to make the mathematical transcriptions.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top