Translational and rotational motion

Tonyt88
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
1. A uniform stick of mass m and length l spins arounds on a frictionless horizontal table, with its CM stationary (but not fixed by a pivot). A mass M is placed on the plane, and the end of the stick collides elastically with it, as shown. What should M be so that after the collision the stick has translational motion, but no rotational motion?




2. This is where I get stuck



3. I'm hindered not only because I don't know which equations to apply, but also, I don't know what would result in the stick having just translational motion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
3. I'm hindered not only because I don't know which equations to apply, but also, I don't know what would result in the stick having just translational motion.[/QUOTE]

What equations do you usually use for problems involving impact? Hint: conservation of ...

If the mass was very light (like a speck of dust) the stick would just knock it out of the way and carry on rotating. If the mass was very heavy, the mass wouldn't move much, but the stick would bounce off and probably it would be rotating the opposite way. Somewhere in between, there is a mass where the rotation after the collision is zero. That's what you need to find.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top