Translational Kinetic Energies + Plane

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the ratio of translational kinetic energies of a ring, a coin, and a solid sphere at the bottom of an inclined plane, assuming they roll without slipping after being released from rest.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between linear velocity and angular velocity, questioning the application of the formula v=ωr. There is an inquiry about using the acceleration of the center of mass to find final velocity. Some participants suggest focusing on energy conservation principles to relate kinetic and potential energy.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants exploring different interpretations of velocity in rolling motion and the implications for kinetic energy calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding energy conservation, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants assume that all objects have the same mass and radius, and they are considering the potential energy being the same for all objects due to their starting height.

Kishor Bhat
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the ratio of the translational kinetic energies of a ring, a coin, and a solid sphere at the bottom of an inclined plane. The bodies have been released from rest at the top. Assume pure rolling without any slipping.


The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I'm really not sure. Since T.K.=1/2 m*v^2, we need to look at linear velocities v at the bottom of the plane for each object. Obviously the rotation will influence this, and I've tried obtaining final ω and using v=ωr at the bottom, but I'm not getting the answer. Which, by the way, is 21:28:30.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps you are confusing the linear velocity from v=ωr, which is the instantaneous velocity of the edge of the rolling object, with the linear velocity of the center of mass of the object.

Beside that, are you using the correct moments of inertia for the different objects? I'm assuming the masses and radii are all the same.
 
The MI's are correct, and yes, they are all of same mass and radius. One question: can we find the acceleration of c.o.m and then use the equations of motion to find final velocity? I haven't tried that.
 
PICsmith said:
Perhaps you are confusing the linear velocity from v=ωr, which is the instantaneous velocity of the edge of the rolling object, with the linear velocity of the center of mass of the object.

Nevermind this statement...while yes they are different things, in this case they are the same velocity (the center of mass velocity in the frame at rest w.r.t. the ramp is of course the same as the linear velocity of the edge in the co-moving frame, since there is no slipping).

You don't have to calculate any velocites. Here's how you go about it. For example, for the ring you have KE = PE-RE = PE-(1/2)Iω^2 = PE-(1/2)mv^2 = PE-KE, and so you have KE=PE/2. Obtain the KE in terms of PE for the other two objects, and then you can take the ratios between them.

Edit: Keep in mind that the PE for each object is the same since they all start at the same height and have the same mass.
 
Last edited:
Gracias.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
21K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K