Transmission and Reflection Amplitude for Delta Potential SE

mjordan2nd
Messages
173
Reaction score
1
This is not a homework question per se, but it's a simple enough computation question from some notes I'm reading that I think it belongs in this section. I will do my best to keep to you guys' formatThis is not a homework question per se, but it's a simple enough computation question from some notes I'm reading that I think it belongs in this section. I will do my best to keep to you guys' format.

1. Homework Statement

We are given the following Schrodinger equation

-\frac{1}{2} \psi "(x) + c_0 \delta(x) \psi(x) = E \psi(x)

and we want to calculate the transmission and reflection coefficients. The answers are given in the book, but based on my calculations the answers should be different. So I'm either misunderstanding how to do the calculation or the book is wrong, and I would appreciate if you guys could help me understand which.

Homework Equations



The solution to the equation is (if x<0)

\psi(x) = Ae^{ipx} + Be^{-ipx}
\psi&#039;(x) = ip \left( Ae^{ipx} - Be^{-ipx} \right)

and if x>0

\psi(x) = Ce^{ipx}.
\psi&#039;(x) = ipCe^{ipx}

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Integrating the Schrodinger equation over a small interval (-\epsilon, \epsilon) gives us

-\frac{1}{2} \left[ \psi&#039;(\epsilon) - \psi&#039;(-\epsilon) \right] + c_0 \psi(0) = E \int_{-\epsilon}^\epsilon \psi(x) dx.

Letting \epsilon \rightarrow 0 gives us the following condition according to my calculation:

\frac{ip}{2} \left[-C+A-B \right] +c_0 C = 0.

However, the notes say that this condition should be

\frac{ip}{2} \left[C-A+B \right] c_0 C = 0.

Who is right? This leads to different transmission and reflection amplitudes. According to the notes they are

T=\frac{C}{A} = \frac{p}{p+ic_0}
R = =\frac{B}{A} = -\frac{ic_0}{p+ic_0}

whereas according to my calculations they are

T=\frac{2c_0-ip}{c_0-ip}

and I didn't really calculate R because it didn't seem worth it until I knew whether or not I was correct or not. Anyway, your assistance would be appreciated in clarifying this matter. Thanks you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get your result for the equation relating A, B, and C. But then I get their results for R and T.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top