Transmission Coefficient of a double delta function potential

jmm5872
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
V(x) = |g| (δ(x+L)+δ(x-L)

Consider scattering from a repulsive twin-delta function potential.

Calculate R and T.

I'm mostly confused about computing the T coefficients for multiple barriers. Would I compute the T coefficient for the barrier at x = -L and at x = L seperately? Then, instead of having to take an integral for the total T, for a large forbidden region, I can simply multiply the two T coefficients together since the Δx is essentially zero for a delta well.

Also, for the wavefunction in each region I have:

ψI = Aeikx+Be-ikx for (x < -L)
ψII = Ceikx+De-ikx for (-L < x < L)
ψIII = Eeikx+Fe-ikx for (L < x )

But the incident wave is from left to right so F = 0. Am I on the right track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that you are on the right track.

Probably you only have one T; only for x > L, and then you don't actually match the I,R part to the T part, but rather match the I,R part to the left side of the intermediate part, and then match the right side of the intermediate part to the T part.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top