Transmission for double delta-potential vs single delta

UiOStud
Messages
9
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


In this problem we shall consider the scattering from repulsive δ-function potentials. We have already considered a single such potential. If the strength of the potential is V0, the transmitted and reflected fluxes may be represented by the transmission and reflection coefficients
T=k^2/(1+k^2) and R=1/(1 +k^2) where k =sqrt(2EV0), and we have used so-called natural units defined by the replacement hbar=m= 1. The potentials of strength V0are shown in figure 1. One might assume that the transmission probability through two barriers should always be smaller than the transmission through a single one. In the following, you will show that this is not necessarily the case and provide an explanation for this
effect. Assume the potential V(x) =V0δ(x−q0) +V0δ(x+q0).
a)
Assume further that a particle arrives at the first potential barrier from the left with the energy E, and divide the system into the 3 regions shown in figure1. Determine the scattered wave functions by combining the wave function in each separate region, allowing for the discontinuity in the first derivative of the functions at the location of each δ-function.
b) Find an expression for the total transmission and reflection probabilities as functions of E, q0 and V0. Check that the overall flux is conserved.

c)Show that for some values of E,q0 and V0, the transmitted flux will be larger
than the case for a single delta-potential. Find or derive an explanation for
this phenomenon. It may be useful to draw or plot the real part of the wave function er some selected values of E,q0 and V0 where the phenomenon occurs.If you select E,V0= 1, what separation of the δ-function q0 gives maximum transmission?

Homework Equations


T = abs(F/A)^2 where F is the amplitude of the transmitted wave and A is the amplitude of the incoming wave

The Attempt at a Solution


a) and b) went fine. The challenge is c).
By setting E = 1 and V_0 = 1 in the expression for transmission, you get

T=2/(5+cos(sqrt(8)q0)+2sqrt(2)sin(sqrt(8)q0)

for the double-delta-function. For the single-delta-function from the problemtext I insert k=sqrt(2) and got:

T = 2/3

So if I can find a q0 that makes the first expression for T greater than 2/3 I have proven that the transmission sometimes is greater for a double delta-function than a single delta-function.

By setting q0 to be 0.7 I find that T is 0.89>2/3.

However I can't seem to find a good explanation for this phenomena
[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It may be useful to draw or plot the real part of the wave function er some selected values of E,q0 and V0 where the phenomenon occurs.If you select E,V0= 1, what separation of the δ-function q0 gives maximum transmission?

I suspect this is a strong hint. Is there a relation between the separation of the two deltas and the wavelength of the wave-function?
 
  • Like
Likes UiOStud
In the region between the two delta function you have to add two sinusoidals moving in opposite directions. Does this ring a bell?
 
  • Like
Likes UiOStud
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top