Traveling Wavefunction: Differentiating & Relating $\Psi$

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spylock
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavefunction
Spylock
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Hi, I want to check how to show ##\Phi(x,t)## is a solution to TDSE given that ##\Psi(x,t)## is a solution to TDSE. Note that there is no potential.
Relevant Equations
$$\Phi(x,t)=\Psi(x-ut,t)e^{i(k(x-\omega t)}$$
I am not sure whether I have differentiated correctly
$$\frac{\partial\Psi(x-ut,t)}{\partial t}=-u\frac{\partial\Psi(x-ut,t)}{\partial(x-ut)}+\frac{\partial\Psi(x-ut,t)}{\partial t}$$

and
$$\frac{\partial^2\Psi(x-ut,t)}{\partial x^2}=\frac{\partial^2\Psi(x-ut,t)}{\partial(x-ut)^2}$$

So, we have
$$\frac{\partial\Phi(x,t)}{\partial t}=\frac{\partial\Psi(x-ut,t)}{\partial t}e^{i(kx-\omega t)}-i\omega\Psi(x-ut,t)e^{i(kx-\omega t)}$$
$$\frac{\partial^2\Phi(x,t)}{\partial x^2}=\frac{\partial^2\Psi(x-ut,t)}{\partial x^2}e^{i(kx-\omega t)}-k^2\Psi(x-ut,t)e^{i(kx-\omega t)}+2ik\Psi(x-ut,t)e^{i(kx-\omega t}$$

Also, how do I relate \Psi(x,t) with \Psi(x-ut,t) given that
$$i\hbar\frac{\partial\Psi(x,t)}{\partial t}=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2\Psi(x,t)}{\partial x^2}$$

Thank you for advice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation needs to read: ## \frac{d \Psi(y,t)}{dt}=(\frac{\partial{\Psi(y,t)}}{\partial{y}})_t(\frac{\partial{y}}{\partial{t}})_x+(\frac{\partial{\Psi(y,t)}}{\partial{t}})_y ##, where ## y=x-ut ##.
Also, in the first line, your exponent needs to read ## kx-\omega t ##. (You have a parenthesis in the wrong place). ## u=\frac{\omega}{k} ##.
With the corrections I gave you above, you should be able to finish it up.
 
Also, be careful when taking ## (\frac{\partial{\Phi(x,t)}}{\partial{t}})_x ##. It basically means taking ## \frac{d}{dt} ## of ## \Psi(x-ut)e^{i(kx-\omega t)} ##, but treating ## x ## as a constant.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top