Trend of Electromagnetic Temperature

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the temperature change of an electromagnet when submerged in water, measured after a 3-minute period. Using the equation Q=mcΔT, the energy transferred in joules was calculated for different voltage settings. Despite expectations of a parabolic relationship based on Joule's First Law and Ohm's Law, the results indicated a linear trend. The experiment involved six voltage trials, but concerns were raised regarding potential sources of error, including initial water temperature consistency and heat loss to the environment.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics, specifically heat transfer equations.
  • Familiarity with Joule's First Law and Ohm's Law.
  • Basic knowledge of experimental design and data analysis.
  • Experience with graphing data and determining best-fit lines.
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the principles of heat transfer in fluids and their impact on experimental results.
  • Learn about statistical methods for analyzing experimental data, including regression analysis.
  • Explore advanced concepts in electromagnetism and their thermal effects.
  • Review best practices for minimizing experimental errors in temperature measurement.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physics students, and engineers interested in electromagnetism, thermodynamics, and experimental physics methodologies.

Da Apprentice
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
In order to determine the temperature that an electromagnet reached after a 3 minute period the electromagnet was placed in a constant volume of water. After 3 minutes the change in temperature of the water was measured and from this using the equation Q=mcΔT the energy in joules transferred was calculated. This same process was repeated for the same electromagnet functioning at a different voltage. Graphing the joules exchanged for each experiment against the voltage that the electromagnet was run at produced what appears to be a linear trend.

Why this trend occurred is unknown. It was thought that the trend would be parabolic due to the following;

Joule's First Law: Q=k*I2*R

Ohms Law: V=I*R (hence I=V/R)

Substitution gives: Q=(k*V2)/R

I'm not sure if joules law is the correct law to use in this case and so this is most likely why I'm wrong. Can anyone explain why the result would be linear or confirm that it should in fact have been parabolic.

Thanks
Z.C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you only run 2 trials? You won't be able to determine whether the trend is linear or not without more data points.
 
no in total we ran the experiment at 6 different voltages and an additional point was assumed (at 0,0) because with no voltage the magnet doesn't increase in temperature and therefore no energy would be exchanged between the two.

The graph is attached.

Thanks for the reply.

Z.C.
 

Attachments

  • Graph - Energy Exchange.png
    Graph - Energy Exchange.png
    4.6 KB · Views: 261
Well, to start off how did you determine that a line of the one you have drawn is the best fit for your date points?
For each voltage setting, one would do several runs to have multiple data points.

You have several sources of error to begin with.
There is the experimental temperature difference between initial and final - and you do not say whether all runs of the experiment started at the same initial water temperature.
Also there is the voltage setting error.
And of course the mass of the water.

Calculating Q, by only using the increase in temperature of the water does not allow for the temperature increase of your electromagnet nor any heat lost from the water to the environment.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
926
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K