Triangle inequaility for sets of same cardinality

mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,
given a set \Omega, we consider all its subsets A_1,A_2,A_3,\ldots with same cardinality k.

Do you have some hint in order to prove the following:

\forall A_x,A_y,A_z\subseteq \Omega such that |A_x|=|A_y|=|A_z|=k

|A_x-A_z| \leq |A_x-A_y|+ |A_y-A_z|

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe I solved it by myself.
For the sake of brevity I'll write X=A_x, Y=A_y, Z=A_z.

By reductio-ad-absurdum let's assume that:

|X-Z|>|X-Y|+|Y-Z|

re-writing it in different form, we have that:

|X|-|X \cap Z| > |X|+|Y|-|X \cap Y|-|Y\cap Z|

Now, recalling the inclusion-exclusion formula for three sets X,Y,Z, we can write:

|X|-|X \cap Z| > |X\cup\ Y\cup Z| - |Z| + |X\cap Z| - |X\cap Y\cap Z|

Simply re-arranging the terms, and using the inclusion-exclusion formula for the leftmost term yields:

|X \cup Z| + |X\cap Y\cap Z| > |X\cup\ Y\cup Z| + |X\cap Z|

Now, it is easy to observe that |X \cup Z| \leq |X\cup\ Y\cup Z| and |X \cap Y\cap Z| \leq |X\cap\ Z|, so the leftmost term is always less than or equal to the rightmost term: we reached a contradiction with the initial hypothesis and the statement is proved.

--Interestingly we have not used the fact that |X|=|Y|=|Z|, so apparently the statement holds in general.
 
Last edited:
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Back
Top