Triangle inequality proof in Spivak's calculus

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a confusion regarding the proof of the triangle inequality in Spivak's calculus. A participant questions why Spivak equates two expressions after establishing the inequality, suggesting that the proof could continue with the inequality instead. They also express uncertainty about Spivak's justification for transitioning from squares to the triangle inequality, noting that the reasoning provided only addresses the inequality and not the equality. The participant feels that an important aspect of the proof is overlooked, specifically the distinction between strict and non-strict inequalities. This highlights a common challenge in understanding mathematical proofs and their nuances.
chemistry1
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
proof.jpg


So hi, there's one little thing which I'm not understanding in the proof. After the inequality Spivak considers the two expressions to be equal. Why?!?

I just don't see why we can't continue with the inequality and when we have factorized the identity to (|a|+|b|)^2 we can just replace (a+b)^2 with (|a+b|)^2 and take the square root of both sides to finally have :

|a+b| <= |a|+|b|

Thank you for explaining !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No need to answer, it's understood !
 
You could also start from ##-|a| \leq a \leq |a|##.
 
Well, I have another question. When Spivak justifies the passage from the squares to |a+b| <= |a|+|b| he says the following : x^2<y^2 supposes that x<y for x,y in N. Now, the only thing bugging me is the following : Why didn't he do the following x^2<=y^2 supposes that x<=y for x,y in N ? Because what he says only justifies the inequality and not the equality ! Like a part is missing ! Am I right ? Thank you!
 
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top