Tricky integral in QM variational method

akehn
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the variational parameters \beta, \mu for a particle in one in one dimension whose group-state wave function is given as:

\varphi(\beta,\mu)=Asin(βx)exp(-\mux^{2}) for x≥0.

The wavefunction is zero for x<0.

Homework Equations


The Hamiltonian is given as:

H=-\frac{\\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{d^{2}}{dx^{2}}+V(x)

Where the potential field is defined as follows: V(x)=+∞ for x<0
and V(x)=\frac{-f}{(x+a)^{2}} for x≥0

The terms f, a are positive constants.

3. The Attempt at a Solution
I am familiar with the general procedure. I know that

E(β,μ)=<T> + <V>

Where E are the eigen energies and T, V are the kinetic and potential energies, respectively.

To minimize the Hamiltonian one takes partial derivatives of E with respect to β and μ, setting each term equal to zero to determine the variational parameters. This is all straightfoward.

My confusion lies in the evaluation of the normalization coefficient A from <\varphi|\varphi>=1

The closest tabulated integral has "x" in the exponential term, not "x^{2}"

Any help on solving this integral would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
akehn said:

Homework Statement


Find the variational parameters \beta, \mu for a particle in one in one dimension whose group-state wave function is given as:

\varphi(\beta,\mu)=Asin(βx)exp(-\mux^{2}) for x≥0.

The wavefunction is zero for x<0.

Homework Equations


The Hamiltonian is given as:

H=-\frac{\\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{d^{2}}{dx^{2}}+V(x)

Where the potential field is defined as follows: V(x)=+∞ for x<0
and V(x)=\frac{-f}{(x+a)^{2}} for x≥0

The terms f, a are positive constants.

3. The Attempt at a Solution
I am familiar with the general procedure. I know that

E(β,μ)=<T> + <V>

Where E are the eigen energies and T, V are the kinetic and potential energies, respectively.

To minimize the Hamiltonian one takes partial derivatives of E with respect to β and μ, setting each term equal to zero to determine the variational parameters. This is all straightfoward.

My confusion lies in the evaluation of the normalization coefficient A from <\varphi|\varphi>=1

The closest tabulated integral has "x" in the exponential term, not "x^{2}"

Any help on solving this integral would be greatly appreciated.

Hi akehn, welcome to PF! :smile:

Integrals of the form \int_0^\infty e^{-x^2}dx can be easily computed by first calculating the square of the integral, transforming the problem from one of calculating a one-dimensional integral to one of calculating a two-dimensional integral over a region, since the 2D integral can be done easily by switching to polar coordinates

\begin{align} \left( \int_0^{\infty} e^{-x^2}dx \right)^2 &amp;= \left( \int_0^{\infty} e^{-x^2}dx \right) \left( \int_0^\infty e^{-x^2}dx \right) \\ &amp;= \left( \int_0^{\infty} e^{-x^2}dx \right)\left( \int_0^\infty e^{-y^2}dy \right) \\ &amp;= \int_0^{\infty} \int_0^{\infty} e^{-(x^2 + y^2)}dxdy \\ &amp;= \int_0^{\infty} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} e^{-r^2}r dr d\theta \end{align}

You can utilize this technique for your integral, by using Euler's formula to write \sin^2 (\beta x) in terms of complex exponentials, then "completing the square on the exponent" and making a substitution to get your integrand in the correct form.
 
Last edited:
Ah ha! Thank you very much.
 
akehn said:
Ah ha! Thank you very much.

You're welcome! Note that I made a small edit to my post to correct typos, the only one of significance being that the upper limit on the polar angle in the last integral should be \frac{\pi}{2} (90°), not \frac{\pi}{4} (45°).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top