Tricky projectile motion question

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating safe distances from a mountain peak for a ship under bombardment, given the ship's projectile speed and the peak's height. The projectile motion equations are used to determine the trajectory, focusing on angles that allow the projectile to just clear the peak. The discussion highlights the challenge of isolating the angle in the constraint while minimizing the range. It emphasizes the need to consider both ascent and descent angles for the projectile's trajectory. Ultimately, the solution is found by focusing on the downward angle that allows the projectile to clear the peak.
johnyk87
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An enemy ship is on the east side of a mountain island. The enemy ship has maneuvered to within 2500 m of a 1800 m high mountain peak and can shoot projectiles with an initial speed of 250 m/s. If the western shoreline is horizontally 300 m from the peak, what are the distances from the western shore at which a ship can be safe from the bombardment of the ship?


Homework Equations


y= 250m/s*sin(x)t + .5gt^2
x= 250m/s*cos(x)t

R= v^2sin(2x)/g

The Attempt at a Solution



I can set up the problem as a constraint problem. I tried to minimize the range formula subject to the constraint that the projectile will just go over the mountain peak as it passes. The reasoning for this is that I will be able to reduce the range of a shot by shooting it at a slightly higher angle that will just clear the peak. It is not a technical reason but it seems reasonable. I can set up the problem but isolating the angle in my constraint is tricky. Does anyone know of a better way to go about this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As it follows its trajectory, the projectile can clear the mountain top on its way up ( projection angle less than 45o) or on its way down (projection angle greater than 45o). So you need to find the angles for which the projectile will just barely clear the top and then find the corresponding ranges. Then look for "blind spots" on the other side.
 
Thanks kuruman. I just figured it out a little while ago. I want the angle as it is coming down. For some reason i thought that there would be more than one downward angle that corresponded to just clearing the peak. Thanks again
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top