Trig identity in complex multiplication

Shaybay92
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
Just wondering how this is simplified to the third line:

If w, z are complex numbers

wz = rs( cos\alpha + isin \alpha ) (cos \varphi + isin \varphi)

wz = rs(cos\alpha cos \varphi - sin \alphasin\varphi) + i(sin \alphacos\varphi + cos \alpha sin \varphi))

wz = rs(cos (\alpha +\varphi) + i sin(\alpha +\varphi))

What sort of trigonometric identity is used here between the 2nd and 3rd lines?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Exactly those as written:

sin(a+b) = sin(a)cos(b) + cos(a)sin(b)
cos(a+b) = cos(a)cos(b) - sin(a)sin(b)
 
Thanks I hadn't seen these identities before
 
Shaybay92 said:
Thanks I hadn't seen these identities before

These are basic identities, which are taught in the first course of trigonometry.
 
You would think so but apparently my school doesn't see the importance in teaching this stuff. The only identity we were taught was

sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1

not even all the half angle ones which I'm finding out about now... How helpful for me!
 
It looks like your school must teach trigonometry for a couple of weeks within a broader math course. When I was in high school, we had a one semester course for trig.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top