Trig: Writing the equation for vertical asymptote of a secant function?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the equation for vertical asymptotes of a secant function, specifically in the context of transformations involving the secant function and its relationship to cosine. Participants are exploring the implications of different coefficients in the function's equation on the location of vertical asymptotes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the relationship between the coefficients in the secant function and the resulting vertical asymptotes. There are attempts to derive the asymptote equation through graphing and manipulation of the function's parameters. Questions arise regarding the role of specific constants, such as pi, in determining the asymptote's position.

Discussion Status

There is an active exploration of different interpretations of the problem, with participants sharing their reasoning and methods. Some guidance has been offered regarding the transformation of the function and its impact on the asymptote, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. There is also a discussion about the implications of specific function forms on the asymptote locations, indicating a need for clarity on the definitions and transformations involved.

DinosaurEgg
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


mk7orc.png

Homework Equations


How did they come up with \frac{1}{2}+k for the equation of the vertical asymptote? I understand everything else except this.

The Attempt at a Solution


On this particular exercise, I graphed it and saw that each of my vertical dashed lines were all one whole unit apart. I've tried this method with another problem that had the dashed lines separated 2 units apart, took that 2, and multiplied it by the x=\prod/2 + k\prod. The result was \prod+2k\prod, which was correct.

I tried it with other numbers and have gotten the correct answer, but I have a feeling I'm still doing something wrong. Because with this particular one using my method, I input \prod/2 + k\prod as my answer for the vertical asymptote which was incorrect. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You would be right if the equation were y=4*sec(x). It's not. It's y=4*sec(pi*x). There's already a pi in the equation for y. y=4*sec(pi*x) doesn't have an asymptote at x=pi/2.
 
I noticed multiplying the vertical asymptote formula/equation by 1/pi cancels out the pi, resulting in that 1/2+k... but where did they get 1/pi from? Does that have any relation to secant being 1/cos?
 
Worked on another problem set up similarly and I think I got it!

I noticed that simply taking the 'B' (like in the y=Asin[B(x-C)]+D formula), turning it into the reciprocal (1/B), and thennnn multiplying it by \prod/2 + k\prod gets me the right asymptote. This *does* relate to inverse trig functions (ie, sec being the reciprocal of cos), right?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K