Trigonometric Substitution for Evaluating Integrals: Using t=atan(theta) Model

genu
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Use an appropriate substitution and then a trigonometric substitution to evaluate the integral:
\int_-^{ln(4)} \frac{e^{t}dt}{\sqrt{e^{2t}+9}}

Homework Equations


Seems to be close to the t=atan(\theta) model
\int \frac{e^{t}}{\sqrt{a^{2}+x^{2}}}dt

The Attempt at a Solution



I've rewritten it to reflect the relevant model:
\int \frac{e^{t}}{\sqrt{3^{2}+(??)}}dt

Not sure how to rewrite the e in my attempt...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's probably easiest to think of this in two steps. First substitute u=e^t. What's the integral in terms of u?
 
Thanks, that really helped...

When do that u substitution, however, do I need to rewrite my limits?

because once I integrate, I will be witting everything in terms of t...

so which limits do I use in the end? the originals? or the ones from the u substitution?
 
You will have to rewrite the integration limits yes. It is not so hard to see why, however. You know that your upper limit is t=\ln 4 and you have made the substitution u=e^t. So what value will u become?

because once I integrate, I will be witting everything in terms of t...

If you rewrite everything in terms of t you can of course use the old limits. You are however not allowed to put the original limits below and above the integral sign of the du integral. So if you do not want to change the limits calculate the indefinite integral first in terms of t then fill in the limits.
 
If you don't want to rewrite the limits, just note that e^{2t} = {(e^{t})}^2 and \frac{d}{dt} [e^{t}] = e^{t} and go directly to trig substitution.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top