Triple Integration for Volume: Finding Intersections and Sketching Functions

AI Thread Summary
To find the volume between the two paraboloids defined by f(x,y) = x^2 + y^2 and g(x,y) = 20 - (x-4)^2 - (y+2)^2, it's essential to first determine their intersection. The intersection results in the equation (x+2)^2 + (y-1)^2 = 5, which describes a circle in the xy-plane. Once the intersection is established, the volume can be calculated by subtracting the two z-values and integrating over the defined circular region. For sketching the functions and finding intersections without graphing calculators, manual plotting of key points and symmetry considerations can be beneficial. Understanding these steps is crucial for accurately setting up the triple integral for volume calculation.
Tarhead
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I have a group of problems that deals with the equations:

f(x,y)= x^2+y^2
g(x,y)=20-(x-4)^2-(y+2)^2

Can someone help find the triple integral to find the volume.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would start off by making at the very least a rough sketch of the volume you are trying to find, that way you can find out the boundaries you are dealing with.
 
It might help to clarify the problem: functions don't HAVE a volume!

If you mean "find the volume of the region bounded by z= x2+ y2 (a paraboloid) and z= 20- (x-4)2- (y+2)2 (also a paraboloid)" then you need to determine where the two paraboloids intersect and "project" that down to the xy-plane.

I get (x+2)2+ (y-1)2= 5, a circle. Subtract the two "z" values and integrate over that circle.

(Please do not post the same question twice!)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the help. I have problems with finding the intersection and projecting that on the x-y plane. We cannot use graphing calculators. Are there any easy ways to sketch the functions and/or find the intersection?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top