Trouble with calculating acceleration from velocitity using calculus

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the calculation of acceleration from velocity using calculus, specifically after the equation a = v dv/ds. The chain rule is highlighted as a key concept, allowing the derivative of velocity with respect to time to be expressed in terms of position. By substituting velocity as a function of position, v(s) = 0.2s + 10, the derivative dv/ds is calculated as 0.2. This leads to the final expression for acceleration, a = 0.04s + 2, demonstrating the application of basic calculus rules. The explanation clarifies the connection between velocity and acceleration through differentiation.
James22
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I don't understand what is happening after the a=v dv/ds statement. If someone could explain the steps using calculus to end up with a=0.04s + 2 I would really appreciate it. I am trying to figure it out by reading over my old calculus notes, but I can't make a connection between the two.

Homework Statement


oidk41.jpg



Homework Equations



a=v dv/ds

The Attempt at a Solution



I am just trying to follow along at this point. I don't understand what is happening after the a=v dv/ds statement. If someone could explain the steps using calculus to end up with a=0.04s + 2 I would really appreciate it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The steps make use of a property of differentiation called the chain rule. It basically says that the derivative of a function with respect to one variable (e.g. x) can be expressed as the product of the derivative of that function with respect to another variable (e.g. y) times the derivative of y with respect to x (provided y also depends on x). That statement may have been difficult to parse, so here it is in equation form:

If f is a function of y, f(y), and y is also a function of x, y(x), then:

\frac{df}{dx} = \frac{df}{dy}\frac{dy}{dx}​

This is the chain rule for differentiation. In your example, the chain rule has been applied to the derivative of velocity with respect to time. Velocity is a function of time, v(t), but position is also a function of time s(t). therefore, using the chain rule, we can write:

a(t) = \frac{dv}{dt} = \frac{dv}{ds}\frac{ds}{dt}​

Now, in this last step, ds/dt, which is the rate of change of position with time, is just velocity (v = ds/dt by definition). So, substituting v for ds/dt, the expression becomes:

a(t) = \frac{dv}{dt} = \frac{dv}{ds}v​
 
Last edited:
Rewriting it in this way is useful because you already know the velocity as a function of position v(s) (rather than time). It is given to you in graphical format. So, the remaining steps are:

v(s) = 0.2s + 10​

To differentiate the velocity with respect to position, basic calculus rules were used. The derivative of a sum of two functions is the sum of the derivatives of those two functions. Also, remember the power rule for differentiation of functions that can be expressed as powers of the independent variable. If:

f(s) = As^n​

then:

\frac{df}{ds} = nAs^{n-1}​

For this reason, the derivative of a constant function is zero, because n=0 in that case. Intuitively, a constant function doesn't change, so its rate of change is zero. In our particular example, we can apply these rules as follows:

v(s) = 0.2s^1 + 10

\frac{dv}{ds} = \frac{d}{ds}(0.2s^1 + 10) = \frac{d}{ds}(0.2s^1) + \frac{d}{ds}(10) = 0.2s^0 + 0 = 0.2​

Therefore:

v\frac{dv}{ds} = (0.2s + 10)(0.2) = 0.04s + 2​
 
Thank you Cepheid, I understand now.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top