Troubleshooting Experimental Results: Measuring g with Gedanken Experiments

  • Thread starter Thread starter Einshteinlover
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a Ph.D. student attempting to measure the acceleration due to gravity (g) through gedanken experiments due to a lack of lab access. The student reports inconsistent timing results from three trials using a stopwatch, leading to confusion about the accuracy of their method. Participants emphasize the need for precise timing equipment, suggesting that manual timing is unreliable for such experiments. Questions arise regarding the validity of obtaining empirical results from a thought experiment, with some contributors expressing skepticism about the student's approach and background. The conversation highlights the challenges of conducting experiments without proper tools and the importance of accurate methodologies in scientific research.
Einshteinlover
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hey Everybody,

I have only posted here a few times before, so if you need some context, please look at my past posts. Basically, I don't have access to a lab right now (long story there) and I have a thesis which depends on empirical results. Normally I would have thrown in the towel, but graduating is really important to me and so I thought I would try my hand at obtaining my results through gedanken experiments. To start simple I tried to measure the value of g. I imagined dropping a lead ball from a height of 1 meter to the ground (in a vacuum of course) and timing the fall using the formula \begin{equation}g=\frac{2h}{t^{2}}\end{equation}. So far so good, but I am not obtaining results consistent with other experiments. I ran 3 trials and obtained times of .567 seconds .217 seconds and 1.21 seconds (all results to within .001s). Neglecting the lack of precision, my results are hardly accurate :( and I'm at a loss as to what could be happening. RIght now I am using a stopwatch timer (which I admit is not very accurate), but I don't see where the error comes from! Please help, I can answer any questions about my experiments!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How can you have experimental results in a thought experiment?
 
How are you starting and stopping the timing? You really need an electronic stop and start if you don't already have them. You can't expect any useful results timing by eye.

Edit... oh, it's a thought experiment. In that case, I don't understand any of this.
 
Einshteinlover said:
if you need some context, please look at my past posts.

According to one of those posts, you're a third-year Ph.D. student, at least of last August, which makes the purpose of the experiment you described rather puzzling, especially if you need it in order to "graduate."
 
This is a kind of question I'd expect from a high school student, not a third year PhD... something is seriously out of place here.

Do you have a (bachelors) degree in Physics already?
 
High school students measure g by free fall methods using timing methods described by tfr000 in post three. If all you have is a stop watch you can get reasonble results from pendulum type experiments.
 
Last edited:
Why don't you just think about better results?

I would think of getting 1.11 s - that would mean I am on the Moon, which would nicely coincide with the vacuum.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Maybe your gedank stopwatch is broke
 
If there is a real experiment behind this problem, we'll need more information to be able to say anything.
In the gedankenexperiment, if your timing is so wrong the method (here: manual operation of a stopwatch) simply does not work.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #10
You said you imagined dropping the lead ball. How do you get actual numbers from an imagination?
 
Back
Top