Truck accelerating up/down on wedge with friction.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum acceleration of a four-wheel-drive truck on an inclined surface, considering static friction. The coefficient of static friction (\mu_{s}) and the angle of the incline (\theta) are critical in determining the forces acting on the truck. Participants express confusion about setting up the free body diagram (FBD) and the direction of the frictional force, emphasizing that it opposes the direction of motion. There is also uncertainty about whether to include the engine's force in the FBD, with clarification that the engine's force is typically not considered unless specified. Understanding that friction always opposes movement is highlighted as a key takeaway.
nickclarson
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The coefficient of static friction between a truck and road surface is \mu_{s}. What is the maximum acceleration of a four-wheel-drive truck of mass M if the road surface is at an angle of \theta with the horozontal when the truck is...

a). Climbing

b). Decending

Homework Equations



\textbf{F}_{s} = \mu_{s}\textbf{F}_{n}

The Attempt at a Solution



I figured out the solution some how by magic but I really don't understand it fully. My problem is just setting up the free body diagram in general and knowing which direction the frictional force is pointing. I was also having trouble in knowing whether or not to include the force of the engine driving the car on the FBD.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Unless it says so in the problem, assume that the engine is not taken into account. And the direction of the frictional force is always opposite the direction of motion. For example, when the car is descending (i.e. the direction of motion is pointing down the incline), the force of friction is directed up the incline.





Just as a side note, you can include the entire equation in one
Code:
[ tex ]...[ tex ]
thingy. For example, instead of using separate things, in just one of them you can write

Code:
 \mathbf{F}_s = \mu_s \mathbf{F}_N

which will produce

\mathbf{F}_s = \mu_s \mathbf{F}_N
 
Ohhh ok, I was just assuming that I should take the engine into account because the truck is accelerating and moving in one direction. Isn't the acceleration and movement of the truck a net force that should be added to the FBD? OR are we just looking at the truck at one point in it's movement. Not sure, confused.

I also thought that in the first part, even though the truck is moving upward, it is trying to slide down so the frictional force would point upward. I guess I just need to remember that it always opposes movement.

Thanks for that latex help :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top