True/False regarding Delta Neighborhoods

  • Thread starter Thread starter RJLiberator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta
RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement


True/False: If a particular delta has been constructed as a suitable response to a particular epsilon challenge, then any smaller positive delta will also suffice.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



The submitted solution is as follows:
mathhw1.png


However, when I read this solution, I note that 0 < delta_1 < delta_2.

The submitter goes on to start with delta_1 to then show that delta 2 holds. Didn't the submitter show that if a particular delta has been constructed as a suitable response to a particular epsilon challenge, then any LARGER positive delta will also suffice? This is not what the question asks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RJLiberator said:

Homework Statement


True/False: If a particular delta has been constructed as a suitable response to a particular epsilon challenge, then any smaller positive delta will also suffice.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



The submitted solution is as follows:
View attachment 113966

However, when I read this solution, I note that 0 < delta_1 < delta_2.

The submitter goes on to start with delta_1 to then show that delta 2 holds. Didn't the submitter show that if a particular delta has been constructed as a suitable response to a particular epsilon challenge, then any LARGER positive delta will also suffice? This is not what the question asks.
No, it is not saying that a larger delta works. Here's what I think is going on. A challenge value of ##\epsilon > 0## has been given, which is answered by a value of ##\delta_2##. In the image, a smaller value of ##\delta_1## is then selected. Now, if ##|x - c | < \delta_2## it will also be true (almost trivially) that ##|x - c | < \delta_1##, which in turn implies that ##|f(x) - f(c)| < \epsilon##
 
RJLiberator said:

Homework Statement


True/False: If a particular delta has been constructed as a suitable response to a particular epsilon challenge, then any smaller positive delta will also suffice.

There are two aspects to limits: an understanding of what you are trying to do; and, the nitty-gritty manipulation of epsilons and deltas etc.

In this case, the understanding should be clear: finding a delta means you are "close enough" to a point and if you reduce the delta you are "even closer". While, increasing the delta means you are "further away".

You really shouldn't be having any trouble seeing this.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top