Trusting Physics channels on YouTube

  • Thread starter Thread starter Abphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Youtube
AI Thread Summary
While channels like Vsauce and MinutePhysics provide engaging and thought-provoking content, they should not be relied upon as definitive sources for academic citation. It is advisable to verify the information presented in these videos, as they often condense complex topics into brief formats, which can lead to oversimplification. Fraser Cain and PBS Space Time are mentioned as more reliable alternatives, yet even their content should be approached with a critical mindset. Utilizing these channels as a starting point for further research is recommended, with a preference for peer-reviewed sources for rigorous academic work. Trusting physics channels can be beneficial, but always prioritize verification and deeper exploration of the topics discussed.
Abphysics
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Should I trust what people say like Vsauce or MinutePhysics about content or should I double check the information always?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Those are two of the more well known physics channels on youtube. I'd say generally you can trust them, but certainly I wouldn't use them as a source or for citation.
 
Fraser Cain and PBS Space Time is pretty good. Youtube videos are almost never a good source for citations unless it's a University lecture.
 
  • Like
Likes Wormwood
Flatland said:
Fraser Cain and PBS Space Time is pretty good. Youtube videos are almost never a good source for citations unless it's a University lecture.
PBS Space Time is Phenomenal
 
There's a saying in my industry: trust but verify.

Both of those channels tend to put out high quality, thought-provoking and generally interesting material, from what I've seen. But I wouldn't assume they're infallible.

One immediate issue that comes to mind is the problem of condensing a broad topic into a one-to-five minute video. It doesn't matter how good you are, in order to do this, you need to skip over some details somewhere.

So as with learning just about anything, it's reasonable to use these channels as a springboard. If you're really interested in something that they cover, seek out other sources. In an academic sense you want to seek out sources that are peer reviewed, although, such sources are often less accessible as they are written for other researchers. But that's the gold standard.
 
  • Like
Likes newbz
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...

Similar threads

Back
Top