How can a NAND gate be used as a NOT gate?

AI Thread Summary
A NAND gate can function as a NOT gate by connecting both of its inputs to the same signal, producing an inverted output. The discussion revolves around the truth tables for the NAND gate and the confusion regarding the arrangement of input combinations. Participants clarify that although the order of inputs in the truth tables may differ, the outputs must remain consistent for each unique input combination. Ultimately, there is only one correct set of outputs corresponding to the four possible input combinations. The conclusion is that both truth tables presented are valid as long as they accurately reflect the same output for the same inputs.
moenste
Messages
711
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


(a)

bba80517b798.jpg


e0bf5a3cb5c2.jpg


The diagram represents a NAND gate with two inputs, T1 and T2, and an output X. Copy the truth table above and complete it.

Show how a NAND gate can become a NOT gate.

(b)

681e31fb40ef.jpg


Draw up a truth table for the combination of NAND gates shown above.

2. The attempt at a solution
(a) The truth table:

4e5af0c98874.jpg


A NAND gate is an AND and a NOT gate:

combined_and_not.jpg


(b) First of all, I shall add letters to the graph:

9bc19d6a1af0.jpg


I got two truth tables and not sure which one is correct.

559af6128d28.jpg


Are they both correct in this situation (so the problem has two solutions)? Looks like the answer depends on what combination does one put in the first two columns: 00 10 01 11 or 00 01 10 11 (specifically 10 01 or 01 10).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your truth tables are identical.

I don't see any reason for duplicating column T2. One entry for T2 should suffice.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
NascentOxygen said:
Your truth tables are identical.

I don't see any reason for duplicating column T2. One entry for T2 should suffice.
Are you sure? In the left one the output is 0011 and in the second 0101. Maybe I miss something? This doesn't look identical...

(I assume the (a) part is correct, right? Since you didn't mention it.)
 
You have swapped 2 rows, that's all.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
NascentOxygen said:
You have swapped 2 rows, that's all.
But the output X is different, or it is acceptable?

In other words both solutions are correct?
 
moenste said:
But the output X is different, or it is acceptable?

In other words both solutions are correct?
There is only one solution; you have written it out twice.

For each input combination there can be only one output. There are 4 possible input combinations, the order in which you document them in a table does not matter.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
withdrawn
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes moenste
NascentOxygen said:
There is only one solution; you have written it out twice.

For each input combination there can be only one output. There are 4 possible input combinations, the order in which you document them in a table does not matter.
TomHart said:
I think you may be making this problem harder than it needs to be.
Well, the output in X is different in the tables, so I thought I got it wrong somewhere.
 
withdrawn
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #10
TomHart said:
How many inputs and outputs does a NOT have?
One input and one output? It's an inverter.
 
  • #11
moenste said:
Well, the output in X is different in the tables, so I thought I got it wrong somewhere.
Your outputs are listed in a different order only because the inputs have been listed in a different order.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #12
NascentOxygen said:
Your outputs are listed in a different order only because the inputs have been listed in a different order.
So in sum: both tables are correct and both solutions are acceptable?
 
  • #13
There is only one solution: the set of 4 outputs for 4 unique input combinations. Whatever way you tabulate these 4 lines is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
Back
Top