Tub/Shower Head: Fluid dynamics question

AI Thread Summary
A shower head was installed in a bathtub but initially provided inadequate water flow due to a small orifice size of 3/32". After enlarging the orifice to 3/16", the flow rate significantly improved, satisfying the customer. The flow rate increases quadratically with the diameter of the orifice, meaning that doubling the diameter can quadruple the flow rate. It's important to consider municipal building codes that may require flow restrictors in shower heads to ensure compliance. Always inform customers about these regulations before making modifications.
ABI Builders
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I installed a shower head in a customer's bath tub last week. The customer was not happy with the flow of water coming from the shower--so I removed the shower head and noted the orfice that leads to the spray area in the shower head was only 3/32" in diameter. I drilled a hole enlarging the orfice to 3/16". I reinstalled the shower head and the customer was happy with the new larger volume of water.

Water pressure is at 25psi and enters the shower head via a 1/2" steel pipe and then from the orfice fills a standard shower head to spray out.

How can I calculate the volume differences with changes in orfice size?

Thank you
Josh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The relevant quantity is flow rate: volume/time.

This scales quadratically along with the diameter of the hole, so doubling the diameter quadrupled the flow rate.
 
Some municipal building codes require flow restrictors in replacement shower heads, just as they require low flush toilets. You should check the code so you don't unkowingly put your customer out of compliance. (They can always choose to do it anyway, once they're informed ;o)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top