Turbochargers, what's the diffrence between the turbine and compressor

AI Thread Summary
In automotive fixed geometry turbochargers, the compressor is typically larger than the turbine due to differences in gas speed and flow dynamics. The turbine operates with hot exhaust gases that expand and accelerate more efficiently than cold intake air, leading to variations in design. Using a turbine as a compressor is impractical because turbines are engineered to decrease energy, while compressors are designed to increase it, making them non-interchangeable. Additionally, the specific blade design and optimization parameters are crucial for each function, rendering simple modifications ineffective. Overall, understanding these distinctions is essential for effective turbocharger application and design.
James125
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone. I'm new to the forum. I'm an engineer...admittedly perhaps not a great one.

I wanted to know about a typical automotive fixed geometry turbocharger. Generally it seems that the compressor is larger than the turbine. Despite being more mass flow on the turbine side. :confused: Why exactly is this?

Also another part to my question - If you used the turbine as a compressor for atmospheric air, what would it's flow and pressure be like? Would it be very inefficient?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi James125!

Some photographs show a larger compressors, others not - comparison not obvious.

Gas speed determines the tip speed of the wheels, not the (marginally different) mass flow. On a centrifugal compressor, gas speed is a bit lower than metal speed, with the blades curved backwards, in order to stabilize the throughput: more flow means less pressure. But on all turbine designs I've seen for turbochargers, gas speed equals metal speed, with blade tips straight. That would be one reason for larger compressors wheels.

More reasons make the comparison difficult.
- Hot exhaust gas gets more easily speed than cold intake air (that's why a gas turbine works).
- The exhaust gas can expand further within the turbine wheel, not just upstream of it.
- The width of the wheels can differ, not just the diameter.

Use the turbine as a compressor: not so good...
- The straight blades give no stability to the mass flow.
- The outlet is a bad intake, with wrong diameter and blade curve
- The turbine's high-temperature material is more expensive!
It's more a question of optimization, but turbomachines need optimization to work.
 
A very informative answer. I have observed that some turbines do have curved blades. If this is the case could the turbine be ran in reverse? So the outlet is the inlet and the blades spin in the opposite direction.

I ask because I am thinking of recycling a turbocharger and using the turbine impeller as a compressor, as I think the compressor impeller is too large for my application.
 
No. A turbine is designed to lower the energy of the air. A compressor increases it.
They are designed for two different things and are not interchangeable.

Just having a "curved blade" is meaningless.
There are critical parameters associated with the twist of the blade, as well as with everything else inside of it.
 
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Calculate minimum RPM to self-balance a CMG on two legs'
Here is a photo of a rough drawing of my apparatus that I have built many times and works. I would like to have a formula to give me the RPM necessary for the gyroscope to balance itself on the two legs (screws). I asked Claude to give me a formula and it gave me the following: Let me calculate the required RPM foreffective stabilization. I'll use the principles of gyroscopicprecession and the moment of inertia. First, let's calculate the keyparameters: 1. Moment of inertia of...
Back
Top