Turbulence in pipe flow (Reynold's Number)

AI Thread Summary
Blockages in pipes can affect fluid flow, transitioning it from laminar to turbulent based on the blockage's diameter and the flow's velocity. The Reynolds number (Re), calculated using flow velocity, pipe diameter, and fluid viscosity, indicates flow regime: laminar flow occurs at Re < 2000, while turbulent flow develops at Re > 4000. Introducing an obstacle can induce turbulence at lower Reynolds numbers, but if the Reynolds number is too low, the flow may revert to laminar. Understanding these dynamics is crucial, especially in medical contexts like blood flow, where arterial blockages can lead to turbulence. Calculating the critical diameter for blockages requires knowledge of flow velocity, dynamic viscosity, and pipe dimensions.
jabotabek
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have some confusion about how blockages result in the laminar/turbulent flow of fluids in pipes.

From my understanding, there is a certain diameter of a blockage in a pipe that will cause the flow to transition from laminar to turbulent (depending on the velocity of flow, etc.)

What is the relationship between Reynold's Number and this?

Is there any way to calculate the critical diameter of blockage that will result in turbulence?

I am thinking about this in terms of blood flow, where the narrowing or blockage of arteries may cause turbulence to occur.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jabotabek said:
I have some confusion about how blockages result in the laminar/turbulent flow of fluids in pipes.

From my understanding, there is a certain diameter of a blockage in a pipe that will cause the flow to transition from laminar to turbulent (depending on the velocity of flow, etc.)

What is the relationship between Reynold's Number and this?

Is there any way to calculate the critical diameter of blockage that will result in turbulence?

I am thinking about this in terms of blood flow, where the narrowing or blockage of arteries may cause turbulence to occur.

Thanks

The Reynold's number for internal flow in circular pipes is calculated as:

Re = v D / \nu

where v is the flow velocity, D is the internal diameter of the pipe, and \nu is the kinematic viscosity of the fluid.

Laminar flow in pipes generally occurs when Re < 2000 approx. and fully turbulent flows aren't developed until Re > 4000. The range in between is known as the transition zone.

Turbulent flow in pipes is usually sought after, since the resistance to flow in the fully turbulent condition tends toward a value which is independent of the Reynolds number. OTOH, the resistance to flow in the laminar condition is inversely proportional to the Reynolds number, and even though the Reynolds number for laminar flow is lower than for turbulent flow, the pumping losses can be quite higher, given a certain system of pipes through which the flow must travel.

As an example of this, heavy petroleum products have high kinematic viscosities, and pumping this material thru even large pipe can generate large losses because the flow is either in the laminar or transition zones. By heating the products before pumping, the viscosity of the material can be greatly reduced, which increases the Reynolds number of the flow at the velocities which are desirable for piping systems, thus putting the flow into the fully turbulent regime, and reducing the amount of power required to pump such material.

http://udel.edu/~inamdar/EGTE215/Laminar_turbulent.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
SteamKing, I think what jabotabek is asking is how this behavior changes when you put an obstacle in the flow. You can force the transition to turbulence at a lower Reynolds numbers by disturbing the flow but if the Reynolds number is too low, then relaminarization occurs.
 
bigfooted said:
SteamKing, I think what jabotabek is asking is how this behavior changes when you put an obstacle in the flow. You can force the transition to turbulence at a lower Reynolds numbers by disturbing the flow but if the Reynolds number is too low, then relaminarization occurs.
SteamKing said:
The Reynold's number for internal flow in circular pipes is calculated as:

Re = v D / \nu

where v is the flow velocity, D is the internal diameter of the pipe, and \nu is the kinematic viscosity of the fluid.

Laminar flow in pipes generally occurs when Re < 2000 approx. and fully turbulent flows aren't developed until Re > 4000. The range in between is known as the transition zone.

Turbulent flow in pipes is usually sought after, since the resistance to flow in the fully turbulent condition tends toward a value which is independent of the Reynolds number. OTOH, the resistance to flow in the laminar condition is inversely proportional to the Reynolds number, and even though the Reynolds number for laminar flow is lower than for turbulent flow, the pumping losses can be quite higher, given a certain system of pipes through which the flow must travel.

As an example of this, heavy petroleum products have high kinematic viscosities, and pumping this material thru even large pipe can generate large losses because the flow is either in the laminar or transition zones. By heating the products before pumping, the viscosity of the material can be greatly reduced, which increases the Reynolds number of the flow at the velocities which are desirable for piping systems, thus putting the flow into the fully turbulent regime, and reducing the amount of power required to pump such material.

http://udel.edu/~inamdar/EGTE215/Laminar_turbulent.pdf

Thank you SteamKing and bigfooted for your inputs on this topic.

Do you know if there is any way to determine the critical diameter of a pipe which will cause turbulence? (See image)

The flow velocity, dynamic viscosity and pipe dimensions are known.

ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1409418049.913771.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top