Tutor (me) needs help on pulley angular accel question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a high school teacher seeking assistance with a pulley problem involving angular acceleration for a tutoring session. The teacher has a solid grasp of typical pulley questions but is out of practice with angular acceleration concepts, which are not part of the current high school curriculum. Participants suggest applying Newton's 2nd law for both rotation and translation, emphasizing the importance of free body diagrams for each object involved. They note that the combined rotational inertia of the two discs must be considered, as well as the different radii at which the ropes attach. The conversation highlights the need for a deeper understanding of how the components interact when mounted together.
Ground State
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am a high school teacher tutoring a family member in an introductory university class. I have good knowledge of typical pulley questions and semi-decent knowledge of angular acceleration (it is no longer in the high school curriculum here and I am out of practice). Can anyone give me a solution to the following so I can construct the best way to teach it to someone? Solution WILL NOT be simply handed over. The question is asking to solve for the angular acceleration of the cylinders (frictionless).

http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/70/pulley.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Apply Newton's 2nd law for rotation and for translation. Give it a shot and you'll get plenty of feedback.

As always, start with free body diagrams for each object. You'll need three.
 
I have no trouble doing a calculation for the angular acceleration of the "big disc" with the 2.5 kg rope hanging off the side, and a calculation for the angular acceleration of the "small disc" with the 4.0 kg mass hanging off the side. But I just can't seem to understand the connection of how this all goes together if the two discs are mounted together as one mass.
 
Ground State said:
I have no trouble doing a calculation for the angular acceleration of the "big disc" with the 2.5 kg rope hanging off the side, and a calculation for the angular acceleration of the "small disc" with the 4.0 kg mass hanging off the side. But I just can't seem to understand the connection of how this all goes together if the two discs are mounted together as one mass.
It's really the same basic idea. One difference, of course, is that the rotational inertia of the combined mass is the sum of the separate rotational inertias. A second difference is that the ropes attach at different radii.

How would you draw the free body diagrams?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top