How does the Twin Paradox demonstrate the effects of general relativity?

In summary, Daniel F. Styer, a professor of physics at Oberlin, explains the use of general relativity and the equivalence principle. While the equivalence principle is not entirely true, it is still considered accurate enough for most purposes as no one has been able to measure the difference between gravity and acceleration. He uses the example of a spaceship with two clocks, one in the tail and one in the nose, to demonstrate how the distance between the clocks affects the difference in their speed. This is in line with the special relativity equations and when the two clocks are reunited, the T clock will be behind the N clock by the appropriate amount. However, there is some controversy surrounding the accuracy of the equivalence principle, with some claiming it is
  • #1
PatrickPowers
240
1
Here is an explanations due to Daniel F. Styer, Prof Physics at Oberlin Daniel's original is at https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=bsp&ver=ohhl4rw8mbn4".

He uses general relativity and the equivalence principle. The equivalence principle is not entirely true -- it IS possible to distinguish between gravity and acceleration -- but Daniel says that it is good enough for this purpose, that no one has ever succeeded in measuring the difference. Consider an accelerating spaceship and two clocks. Clock T is in the tail and clock N is in the nose. Each clock sends out a signal once a second. The situation is not symmetric. Clock N measures that clock T's signals come more than one second apart, and clock T measures clock N's signals as closer than a second apart. Both clocks agree that T is slower: no paradox.

What's neat about this is that this difference depends on the distance between T and N. The further apart, the greater the differential in speed. This is what you need to get agreement with the special relativity equations: it depends directly on the distance between the clocks. When the two clocks are reunited the T clock will be behind the N clock by the appropriate amount.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I am disturbed by the statement "The equivalence principle is not entirely true". I was under the impression that the equivalence principle is one of the best confirmed statements in physics - confirmed to ridiculously high precision (1 part in 10 to the 13 or something like that).
 
  • #3
Matterwave said:
I am disturbed by the statement "The equivalence principle is not entirely true". I was under the impression that the equivalence principle is one of the best confirmed statements in physics - confirmed to ridiculously high precision (1 part in 10 to the 13 or something like that).

What I meant was that it is possible to distinguish a gravitational field from an accelerative psuedoforce. I read now that the equivalence principle is the equivalence of inertial and gravitational masses. Sorry about that.
 

What is the Twin Paradox?

The Twin Paradox is a thought experiment used to demonstrate the effects of general relativity. It involves two twins, one of whom stays on Earth while the other travels through space at near-light speed. When the traveling twin returns to Earth, they have aged less than their Earth-bound twin due to the effects of time dilation.

How does the Twin Paradox demonstrate the effects of general relativity?

The Twin Paradox demonstrates the effects of general relativity by showing how time is affected by gravity and velocity. According to the theory of general relativity, time moves slower in the presence of a strong gravitational field or at high velocities. In the Twin Paradox, the traveling twin experiences both of these factors, resulting in them aging slower than their stationary twin.

What is time dilation?

Time dilation is a phenomenon predicted by the theory of relativity where time moves slower for objects in motion relative to objects at rest. This is due to the fact that time is relative and can be affected by factors such as gravity and velocity.

Why is the Twin Paradox considered a paradox?

The Twin Paradox is considered a paradox because it seems to contradict our everyday experience of time. According to our intuition, time should pass at the same rate for both twins, regardless of their relative motion. However, the theory of relativity explains that this is not the case and that time can be affected by various factors, leading to the paradoxical situation of one twin aging slower than the other.

What other experiments or observations support the effects of general relativity?

Other experiments and observations that support the effects of general relativity include the precession of Mercury's orbit, gravitational lensing, and the bending of starlight near massive objects. These phenomena can only be explained by the theory of general relativity and provide further evidence for the validity of the theory.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
716
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
115
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
70
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
6
Replies
208
Views
12K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
Back
Top