Two balls of mass 4kg and 2 kg are moving in 1-D, answer the following

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculation of potential energy and kinetic energy for two colliding balls of different masses. The initial attempt used the equation for momentum conservation but resulted in an incorrect potential energy value due to significant figure issues. It was highlighted that retaining more digits in intermediate calculations can prevent significant errors when subtracting nearly equal numbers. The correct approach involved using a more precise speed value, which led to the accurate result. The conversation emphasizes the importance of numerical analysis and significant figures in physics calculations.
Shivam
Messages
32
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Two balls of mass 4kg and 2kg are moving with speed 10 m/s and 8 m/s, respectively with ball of heavier mass behind the lighter ball. The two balls collide each other elastically. Answer the following questions:
a) The common velocity of the system of balls during collision will be
b) Maximum potential energy stored in the system of two balls during the collision will be about
P.S
Answers- a) 9.3m/s, b) 2.6 J,( according to the book)
Relevant Equations
Conservation of linear Momentum.
My attempt-
a) used equation { MV + mv = (M+m) V' }
and got the right answer.
b) I assumed that potential energy was asked for when the two balls were moving together with velocity 9.3m/s, so
I used that when before the collision K.E( of m) + K.E( of M) will be equal to K.E(of M+m) +P.E( of M+m) or

K.E(m) + K.E(M) = K.E(M+m) +P.E(M+m)

But i got the wrong answer, i got P.E =4.53 , why this is wrong ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try retaining more digits in the intermediate results. You are computing the difference between two large and nearly equal numbers. Slight errors in those numbers will produce significant errors in the computed result.

Alternately, there is a different way of computing the result that avoids this ill-conditioning problem. What is the initial kinetic energy of each ball in the center-of-mass frame?

Welcome to the world of numerical analysis!

Edit: The rules of significant figures could have been a warning here. The figures for energy would have involved a result of about 260 Joules. The computation would have involved an input, "9.3" which was good to two decimal places. Accordingly, that computed result was good to only 2 significant figures [An uncertainty of plus or minus 10 joules]. When you subtracted, the rule of significant figures is that you discard all insignificant places. None of the digits in the computed result of 4.53 Joules are significant.
 
Last edited:
jbriggs444 said:
Try retaining more digits in the intermediate results. You are computing the difference between two large and nearly equal numbers. Slight errors in those numbers will produce significant errors in the computed result.

Alternately, there is a different way of computing the result that avoids this ill-conditioning problem. What is the initial kinetic energy of each ball in the center-of-mass frame?

Welcome to the world of numerical analysis!

Edit: The rules of significant figures could have been a warning here. The figures for energy would have involved a result of about 260 Joules. The computation would have involved an input, "9.3" which was good to two decimal places. Accordingly, that computed result was good to only 2 significant figures [An uncertainty of plus or minus 10 joules]. When you subtracted, the rule of significant figures is that you discard all insignificant places. None of the digits in the computed result of 4.53 Joules are significant.
Thanx for the Welcome, and you were right, the actual value of speed was 9.33333333 and i got the right answer using that.
 
Beams of electrons and protons move parallel to each other in the same direction. They ______. a. attract each other. b. repel each other. c. neither attract nor repel. d. the force of attraction or repulsion depends upon the speed of the beams. This is a previous-year-question of CBSE Board 2023. The answer key marks (b) as the right option. I want to know why we are ignoring Coulomb's force?
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
I treat this question as two cases of Doppler effect. (1) When the sound wave travels from bat to moth Speed of sound = 222 x 1.5 = 333 m/s Frequency received by moth: $$f_1=\frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ (2) When the sound wave is reflected from moth back to bat Frequency received by bat (moth as source and bat as observer): $$f_2=\frac{333}{333-v}\times f_1$$ $$230.3=\frac{333}{333-v}\times \frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ Solving this equation, I get ##v=6.1## m/s but the answer key is...