Two common sense questions (solutions provided)

  • Thread starter Thread starter flyingpig
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two physics questions regarding height measurements and energy conservation in a pulley system. For the incline problem, the height of the square is debated, with a consensus that neither the green nor blue line is entirely accurate, suggesting an average position instead. In the pulley scenario, the 4.0 kg mass reaches a maximum height of 6.36 m before descending back to 5 m due to the inelastic nature of the rope. The non-conservative force is identified as the energy lost when the 7 kg mass impacts the ground, converting kinetic energy into heat. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding energy conservation and the effects of non-conservative forces in mechanical systems.
flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



1) Please forget the concept of center of mass for now

[PLAIN]http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/1773/unledurk.png

OKay my question is, what is the height of the square on the incline? Is it the green line or the blue line? If this was any physics problem, which is the height? ALl measurements are made with respect to the invisible ground which I forgot to draw and the blue line is not supposed to cross extend, I couldn't delete it without deleting the incline

2) The masses shown in Fig are connected by a
massless string over a frictionless, massless pulley
and are released from rest. Use energy conserva-
tion to find the maximum height
reached by the 4.0-kg mass,

[PLAIN]http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/2043/unledeqt.png


Solutions given

The 4-kg mass, with an upward velocity of
5.17 m/s, will rise (as a projectile) an additional
v2/2g = (5.17 m/s)2/(2×9.8 m/s2) = 1.36 m to a
maximum height of 5 m + 1.36 m = 6.36 m off the
floor. (Note: the mechanical energy of both masses is
no longer conserved after the 7-kg mass hits the floor,
because a non-conservative contact force acts to stop
it.)

Question about solution

Does that mean when it reaches h = 5 and then h = 6.36 for brief moment and then it will come back down to h = 5 again for the m = 4kg block because the rope can't actually extend (not elastic)? Is the nonconservative force in the context meaning the heat produced (friction) between the contact forces?

Thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Technically the center of mass position should be used at the top and also at the bottom, but using the bottom of the mass in both cases would be exactly the same. Neither blue nor green is exactly right; half way between (average) would be perfect.

The non-conservative force is when the 7 kg block hits the ground and its remaining kinetic energy is lost (converted to heat, I suppose). Yes, the other block will end up at height 5.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top