Two Conducting Spheres Connected by a Wire

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 48K views
choco_moo
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the figure, r1 = 5 and r2 = 7 cm. Before the conducting spheres are connected by the wire a charge of 5×10-7 C is placed on the smaller sphere while the larger sphere is uncharged. Calculate the charge on the smaller sphere after the wire is connected. Assume that the separation of the spheres is very large compared to their radii.

2wcn29s.jpg



Homework Equations


V = kQ/r


The Attempt at a Solution


I know that at the beginning, only the smaller sphere has a charge. Therefore, the total charge of the system after being connected must equal the same charge. Also, I know that both spheres will have the same potential.

V1 = V2
kQ1/r1 = kQ2/r2

After this point, I'm just clueless on how to figure out those individual charges knowing only the total charge and radii. Any help is great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you've kind of conceptually solved the problem, even if you don't realize it yet. :-p (The only other detail in the problem statement was "Assume that the separation of the spheres is very large compared to their radii," but I think that's just a way saying that you don't have worry about either sphere disrupting the spherical charge distribution of the other sphere. In other words, you should be able to use the normal equations for spheres.)

Things that you have already given or said:

r1 and r2 are given in the problem statement. So they are not unknowns.

"the total charge of the system after being connected must equal the same charge." Yes, that's right, so Q1 + Q2 = 5×10-7 C.

"Also, I know that both spheres will have the same potential. [...] kQ1/r1 = kQ2/r2"

So, by your own words, you are left with two equations, and two unknowns, ...
 
I kind of get what you're saying, but I still can't get it for some reason. This seems really simple, but I just can't figure out how I'd get Q1 when its set equal to another equation with another unknown (Q2).
 
choco_moo said:
I kind of get what you're saying, but I still can't get it for some reason. This seems really simple, but I just can't figure out how I'd get Q1 when its set equal to another equation with another unknown (Q2).

Well, you already know that

Q1 + Q2 = 5×10-7 C.

That means

Q2 = (5×10-7 C) - Q1

Substitute that into

kQ1/r1 = kQ2/r2.

(Wherever it says "Q2" substitute "[5×10-7 C] - Q1")

Now you have 1 equation and 1 unknown. Solve for Q1. (r1 and r2 are known constants given in the problem statement, and you can find k in your textbook [its a fundamental constant])
 
I got it now. I was being so stupid. For some reason, I kept thinking I had to plug in (5e-7 - Q1) for Q2 and (5e-7 - Q2) for Q1 and had to solve for Q1 that way. Thanks for the help!:smile: